FSBHX vs. SCFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class A (FSBHX) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX).
FSBHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 5, 2013. SCFIX is managed by Shenkman Funds. It was launched on Oct 31, 2012.
Performance
FSBHX vs. SCFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSBHX vs. SCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSBHX Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class A | -0.73% | 7.45% | 7.45% | 9.99% | -7.57% | 2.55% | 3.72% | 9.04% | -1.49% | 4.69% |
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund | -0.61% | 7.02% | 6.11% | 9.24% | -2.52% | 5.08% | 3.36% | 7.61% | 0.85% | 3.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSBHX achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than SCFIX's -0.61% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSBHX having a 4.29% annualized return and SCFIX not far ahead at 4.30%.
FSBHX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- -0.73%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 6.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.08%
- 5Y*
- 3.55%
- 10Y*
- 4.29%
SCFIX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSBHX vs. SCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSBHX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SCFIX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSBHX vs. SCFIX — Risk / Return Rank
FSBHX
SCFIX
FSBHX vs. SCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class A (FSBHX) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSBHX | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 2.61 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.98 | 3.70 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.65 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 3.04 | -0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.16 | 15.96 | -4.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSBHX | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.61 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 1.60 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.02 | 1.32 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 1.30 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSBHX and SCFIX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSBHX vs. SCFIX - Dividend Comparison
FSBHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.71%, more than SCFIX's 5.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSBHX Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class A | 6.71% | 7.08% | 5.82% | 5.70% | 2.70% | 2.63% | 3.23% | 3.97% | 4.26% | 3.85% | 4.47% | 4.16% |
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund | 5.00% | 5.54% | 5.85% | 5.21% | 3.86% | 4.93% | 3.24% | 3.78% | 3.87% | 3.09% | 3.07% | 3.38% |
Drawdowns
FSBHX vs. SCFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSBHX drawdown since its inception was -16.79%, which is greater than SCFIX's maximum drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSBHX and SCFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSBHX | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.79% | -13.08% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | -1.63% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.54% | -6.30% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.79% | -13.08% | -3.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -1.01% | -0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -0.52% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 0.31% | +0.25% |
Volatility
FSBHX vs. SCFIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class A (FSBHX) has a higher volatility of 1.07% compared to Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX) at 0.79%. This indicates that FSBHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSBHX | SCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 0.79% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.96% | 1.19% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.22% | 1.96% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.77% | 2.92% | +0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.21% | 3.27% | +0.94% |