PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSB.TO vs. ZSDB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSB.TO vs. ZSDB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Enhanced Short Duration Bond Fund (FSB.TO) and BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF (ZSDB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSB.TO achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly higher than ZSDB.TO's 0.75% return.


FSB.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.10%
6M
0.86%
YTD
1.28%
1Y
2.77%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
2.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.54%

ZSDB.TO

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.31%
6M
0.65%
YTD
0.75%
1Y
0.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$46.58KCA$37.38KCA$75.82K
CA$95.38KCA$123.97KCA$192.88K

FSB.TO vs. ZSDB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FSB.TO
CI Enhanced Short Duration Bond Fund
1.28%3.84%4.40%0.31%
ZSDB.TO
BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF
0.75%1.23%6.02%0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FSB.TO and ZSDB.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2023

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSB.TO vs. ZSDB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSB.TO
FSB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FSB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FSB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

ZSDB.TO
ZSDB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ZSDB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSDB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSDB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSDB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSDB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSB.TO vs. ZSDB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Enhanced Short Duration Bond Fund (FSB.TO) and BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF (ZSDB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSB.TOZSDB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.02

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

0.06

+3.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.37

0.10

+13.27

FSB.TO vs. ZSDB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the ZSDB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSB.TO and ZSDB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSB.TO vs. ZSDB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSB.TO drawdown since its inception was -5.94%, which is greater than ZSDB.TO's maximum drawdown of -3.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSB.TO and ZSDB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSB.TOZSDB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.94%

-3.20%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.81%

-3.20%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-3.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-1.95%

+1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.47%

-0.67%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

1.77%

-1.56%

Volatility

FSB.TO vs. ZSDB.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Enhanced Short Duration Bond Fund (FSB.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.63% compared to BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF (ZSDB.TO) at 0.55%. This indicates that FSB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZSDB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSB.TOZSDB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

0.55%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.71%

1.55%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34%

3.29%

-0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.63%

2.77%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.61%

2.77%

-0.16%

FSB.TO vs. ZSDB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSB.TO has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSDB.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSB.TO vs. ZSDB.TO - Dividend Comparison

FSB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than ZSDB.TO's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSB.TO
CI Enhanced Short Duration Bond Fund
4.02%3.99%3.98%3.99%2.25%1.87%2.68%2.42%2.44%1.20%
ZSDB.TO
BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF
1.35%1.29%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSB.TO and ZSDB.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZSDB.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZSDB.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for FSB.TO.

They also come from different issuers: CI Global Asset Management and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for FSB.TO and 0.09% for ZSDB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSB.TO and ZSDB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer