PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSB.TO vs. WXM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSB.TO vs. WXM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Enhanced Short Duration Bond Fund (FSB.TO) and CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSB.TO achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly lower than WXM.TO's 14.58% return.


FSB.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.10%
6M
0.86%
YTD
1.28%
1Y
2.77%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
2.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.54%

WXM.TO

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.64%
6M
8.35%
YTD
14.58%
1Y
37.34%
3Y*
27.31%
5Y*
18.25%
10Y*
14.53%
ALL TIME*
13.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$46.58KCA$37.38KCA$75.82K
CA$942.04KCA$760.31KCA$844.09K

FSB.TO vs. WXM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSB.TO
CI Enhanced Short Duration Bond Fund
1.28%3.84%4.40%5.21%-1.97%0.67%4.09%3.49%0.91%0.80%
WXM.TO
CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF
14.58%38.16%33.93%3.35%-0.42%20.98%4.61%31.49%-4.88%6.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FSB.TO and WXM.TO is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2017

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSB.TO vs. WXM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSB.TO
FSB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FSB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FSB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

WXM.TO
WXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
WXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
WXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
WXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSB.TO vs. WXM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Enhanced Short Duration Bond Fund (FSB.TO) and CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSB.TOWXM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.40

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

3.95

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.37

15.44

-2.07

FSB.TO vs. WXM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the WXM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSB.TO and WXM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSB.TO vs. WXM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSB.TO drawdown since its inception was -5.94%, smaller than the maximum WXM.TO drawdown of -40.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSB.TO and WXM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSB.TOWXM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.94%

-40.45%

+34.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.81%

-9.49%

+8.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.24%

-12.13%

+10.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-3.99%

-15.87%

+11.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-4.13%

+3.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.47%

-4.47%

+4.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

2.43%

-2.22%

Volatility

FSB.TO vs. WXM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Enhanced Short Duration Bond Fund (FSB.TO) is 0.63%, while CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF (WXM.TO) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that FSB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WXM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSB.TOWXM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

4.60%

-3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.71%

13.13%

-11.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34%

16.24%

-13.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.63%

15.92%

-13.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.61%

16.88%

-14.27%

FSB.TO vs. WXM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSB.TO has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than WXM.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSB.TO vs. WXM.TO - Dividend Comparison

FSB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than WXM.TO's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSB.TO
CI Enhanced Short Duration Bond Fund
4.02%3.99%3.98%3.99%2.25%1.87%2.68%2.42%2.44%1.20%0.00%0.00%
WXM.TO
CI Morningstar Canada Momentum Index ETF
1.17%1.25%1.27%1.38%2.25%1.04%0.78%0.94%1.44%1.38%1.58%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSB.TO and WXM.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WXM.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WXM.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for FSB.TO.

FSB.TO is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while WXM.TO is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for FSB.TO and 0.65% for WXM.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSB.TO and WXM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer