FSAKX vs. AMFEX
FSAKX (Strategic Advisers U.S. Total Stock Fund) and AMFEX (AAMA Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, FSAKX returned 21.58% vs 27.35% for AMFEX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSAKX charges 0.28%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for AMFEX.
Performance
FSAKX vs. AMFEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSAKX achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly lower than AMFEX's 13.15% return.
FSAKX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- 1Y
- 21.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMFEX
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 13.15%
- 6M
- 12.42%
- 1Y
- 27.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- —
FSAKX vs. AMFEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FSAKX Strategic Advisers U.S. Total Stock Fund | 11.18% | 11.58% | 13.73% |
AMFEX AAMA Equity Fund | 13.15% | 17.33% | 3.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSAKX and AMFEX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between FSAKX and AMFEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSAKX vs. AMFEX — Risk / Return Rank
FSAKX
AMFEX
FSAKX vs. AMFEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers U.S. Total Stock Fund (FSAKX) and AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSAKX | AMFEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.52 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 4.70 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.66 | 19.87 | -7.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSAKX vs. AMFEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSAKX drawdown since its inception was -19.58%, smaller than the maximum AMFEX drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAKX and AMFEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSAKX | AMFEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.58% | -30.41% | +10.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.97% | -6.07% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -0.79% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.66% | -4.28% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 1.43% | +0.73% |
Volatility
FSAKX vs. AMFEX - Volatility Comparison
Strategic Advisers U.S. Total Stock Fund (FSAKX) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX) at 3.68%. This indicates that FSAKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSAKX | AMFEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 3.68% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 7.68% | +3.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.74% | 9.90% | +4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 14.23% | +5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 16.93% | +3.06% |
FSAKX vs. AMFEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSAKX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFEX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSAKX vs. AMFEX - Dividend Comparison
FSAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than AMFEX's 10.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMFEX AAMA Equity Fund | 10.60% | 11.99% | 9.19% | 0.92% | 4.82% | 0.22% | 0.44% | 0.78% | 0.83% |
FSAKX Strategic Advisers U.S. Total Stock Fund | 2.72% | 3.02% | 11.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSAKX and AMFEX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSAKX has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to AMFEX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAKX dropped -19.58% vs AMFEX's -30.41%.
AMFEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSAKX and AMFEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer