FRXD.L vs. FLRG.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

FRXD.L (Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF) and FLRG.L (Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - FRXD.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF, while FLRG.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FRXD.L returned 12.20%/yr vs -2.18%/yr for FLRG.L. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

FRXD.L vs. FLRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FRXD.L) and Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FLRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRXD.L achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly higher than FLRG.L's 0.63% return.

FRXD.L

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -1.52%
• 6M: 10.24%
• YTD: 11.06%
• 1Y: 19.06%
• 3Y*: 19.64%
• 5Y*: 12.20%
• 10Y*: —

FLRG.L

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.46%
• 6M: 0.08%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 1Y: 1.35%
• 3Y*: 3.27%
• 5Y*: -2.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRXD.L vs. FLRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FRXD.L Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF	11.06%	24.01%	12.76%	10.32%	-0.01%	17.27%	-4.30%	9.88%
FLRG.L Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	0.63%	0.59%	2.78%	7.71%	-18.99%	-3.01%	5.46%	3.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FRXD.L and FLRG.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2019	0.08

The correlation between FRXD.L and FLRG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FRXD.L vs. FLRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRXD.L

FRXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
FRXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FRXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FRXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FRXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FRXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

FLRG.L

FLRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 16
FLRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FLRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
FLRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 14
FLRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FLRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRXD.L vs. FLRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FRXD.L) and Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FLRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FRXD.L	FLRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	0.40	+1.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.10	0.59	+2.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.07	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.71	0.58	+5.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.52	1.62	+11.90

FRXD.L vs. FLRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRXD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the FLRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRXD.L and FLRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FRXD.L vs. FLRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRXD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.42%, which is greater than FLRG.L's maximum drawdown of -23.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRXD.L and FLRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRXD.L	FLRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.42%	-23.17%	-12.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.30%	-2.48%	-0.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.26%	-3.41%	-6.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.39%	-22.63%	+8.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.31%	-12.19%	+9.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.86%	-10.42%	+6.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.39%	0.89%	+0.50%

Volatility

FRXD.L vs. FLRG.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FRXD.L) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (FLRG.L) at 1.02%. This indicates that FRXD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRXD.L	FLRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.57%	1.02%	+1.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.82%	2.98%	+3.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.72%	3.61%	+5.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.25%	5.37%	+5.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.50%	4.99%	+8.51%

FRXD.L vs. FLRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FRXD.L and FLRG.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FRXD.L vs. FLRG.L - Dividend Comparison

FRXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, while FLRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLRG.L Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FRXD.L Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF	3.98%	4.28%	4.30%	5.00%	5.20%	4.63%	3.53%	4.42%	5.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRXD.L and FLRG.L in my portfolio?

FRXD.L and FLRG.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FRXD.L or FLRG.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FRXD.L or FLRG.L?

FRXD.L and FLRG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

What is the main difference between FRXD.L and FLRG.L?

FRXD.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while FLRG.L is Global Bonds. FRXD.L tracks Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF, while FLRG.L tracks Franklin Sustainable Euro Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc).