PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRXD.L vs. 0Y8Z.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRXD.L vs. 0Y8Z.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (FRXD.L) and iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (0Y8Z.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRXD.L achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly higher than 0Y8Z.L's 10.50% return.


FRXD.L

1D
0.79%
1M
0.30%
6M
11.77%
YTD
12.87%
1Y
20.35%
3Y*
19.35%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*

0Y8Z.L

1D
-0.68%
1M
-1.47%
6M
6.47%
YTD
10.50%
1Y
20.10%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRXD.L vs. 0Y8Z.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FRXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
12.87%24.01%12.76%10.32%2.63%
0Y8Z.L
iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
10.50%24.83%8.63%15.41%1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FRXD.L and 0Y8Z.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2022

0.25

The correlation between FRXD.L and 0Y8Z.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRXD.L vs. 0Y8Z.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRXD.L
FRXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FRXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FRXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

0Y8Z.L
0Y8Z.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
0Y8Z.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0Y8Z.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
0Y8Z.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
0Y8Z.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
0Y8Z.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRXD.L vs. 0Y8Z.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (FRXD.L) and iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (0Y8Z.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRXD.L0Y8Z.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.25

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.15

2.05

+4.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.59

7.79

+6.81

FRXD.L vs. 0Y8Z.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRXD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the 0Y8Z.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRXD.L and 0Y8Z.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRXD.L vs. 0Y8Z.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRXD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.42%, which is greater than 0Y8Z.L's maximum drawdown of -14.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRXD.L and 0Y8Z.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRXD.L0Y8Z.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.42%

-14.60%

-20.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.30%

-10.00%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.26%

-14.60%

+4.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-3.44%

+2.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-2.23%

-1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

2.61%

-1.22%

Volatility

FRXD.L vs. 0Y8Z.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (FRXD.L) is 2.22%, while iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (0Y8Z.L) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that FRXD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0Y8Z.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRXD.L0Y8Z.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.22%

4.03%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.79%

13.24%

-6.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.70%

15.76%

-7.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.24%

18.99%

-7.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.50%

18.99%

-5.49%

FRXD.L vs. 0Y8Z.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRXD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than 0Y8Z.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FRXD.L vs. 0Y8Z.L - Dividend Comparison

FRXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than 0Y8Z.L's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
0Y8Z.L
iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.33%2.53%2.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FRXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
3.91%4.28%4.30%5.00%5.20%4.63%3.53%4.42%5.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRXD.L and 0Y8Z.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 0Y8Z.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

0Y8Z.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FRXD.L.

FRXD.L tracks LibertyQ European Dividend Index-NR, while 0Y8Z.L tracks MSCI EMU Net Index (EUR). They also come from different issuers: Franklin and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FRXD.L and 0.12% for 0Y8Z.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRXD.L and 0Y8Z.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer