FRURX vs. EVUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Utilities Fund Class R (FRURX) and Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund (EVUAX).
FRURX is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Utilities Index. It was launched on Jan 2, 2002. EVUAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 3, 1994.
Performance
FRURX vs. EVUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRURX vs. EVUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRURX Franklin Utilities Fund Class R | 9.51% | 14.28% | 26.66% | -5.22% | 1.32% | 17.55% | -2.13% | 26.68% | 2.19% | 9.34% |
EVUAX Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund | 4.92% | 15.41% | 17.68% | -5.17% | -3.47% | 13.95% | 4.19% | 54.25% | 3.25% | 13.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRURX achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly higher than EVUAX's 4.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FRURX has underperformed EVUAX with an annualized return of 9.73%, while EVUAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.08% annualized return.
FRURX
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 6M
- 8.20%
- 1Y
- 20.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 11.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.73%
EVUAX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -4.30%
- YTD
- 4.92%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- 15.44%
- 3Y*
- 11.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.69%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRURX vs. EVUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRURX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than EVUAX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRURX vs. EVUAX — Risk / Return Rank
FRURX
EVUAX
FRURX vs. EVUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Utilities Fund Class R (FRURX) and Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund (EVUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRURX | EVUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 1.14 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 1.56 | +0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.22 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 2.15 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.61 | 5.19 | +2.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRURX | EVUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 1.14 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.45 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.58 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.67 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRURX and EVUAX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FRURX vs. EVUAX - Dividend Comparison
FRURX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%, more than EVUAX's 5.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRURX Franklin Utilities Fund Class R | 7.23% | 7.48% | 8.37% | 6.12% | 3.39% | 4.66% | 9.54% | 3.90% | 5.49% | 3.30% | 2.43% | 5.78% |
EVUAX Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund | 5.77% | 6.17% | 4.70% | 5.76% | 11.09% | 13.01% | 13.60% | 35.11% | 1.96% | 1.75% | 1.34% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
FRURX vs. EVUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRURX drawdown since its inception was -43.83%, smaller than the maximum EVUAX drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRURX and EVUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRURX | EVUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.83% | -56.00% | +12.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.20% | -7.90% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.83% | -23.32% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.56% | -31.72% | -4.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.99% | -4.30% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.59% | -9.60% | +2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 3.27% | -0.28% |
Volatility
FRURX vs. EVUAX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Utilities Fund Class R (FRURX) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Allspring Utility and Telecommunications Fund (EVUAX) at 4.79%. This indicates that FRURX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRURX | EVUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 4.79% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 9.44% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.13% | 14.63% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 17.01% | -0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 19.04% | -0.27% |