FRUC.L vs. IUCB.L
FRUC.L (Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and IUCB.L (SPDR Bloomberg 1-10 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, from Franklin Templeton and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FRUC.L returned 1.25%/yr vs 3.03%/yr for IUCB.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FRUC.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for IUCB.L.
Performance
FRUC.L vs. IUCB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FRUC.L is traded in GBP, while IUCB.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUCB.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRUC.L achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than IUCB.L's 0.84% return.
FRUC.L
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 0.15%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 6.26%
- 3Y*
- 2.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.25%
- 10Y*
- —
IUCB.L
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 6.13%
- 3Y*
- 3.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.03%
- 10Y*
- —
FRUC.L vs. IUCB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRUC.L Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.15% | 0.24% | 3.75% | 1.75% | -5.43% | -1.01% | 6.06% | 10.92% | 2.86% |
IUCB.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-10 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.84% | 0.15% | 6.37% | 1.48% | 1.51% | -1.48% | 4.81% | 5.31% | 4.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRUC.L and IUCB.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2018 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, FRUC.L and IUCB.L have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.
FRUC.L vs. IUCB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FRUC.L
IUCB.L
Healthcare
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
FRUC.L
IUCB.L
Communication Services
FRUC.L
IUCB.L
Technology
FRUC.L
IUCB.L
Financial Services
FRUC.L
IUCB.L
Energy
FRUC.L
IUCB.L
Basic Materials
FRUC.L
-
IUCB.L
Consumer Cyclical
FRUC.L
-
IUCB.L
Consumer Defensive
FRUC.L
-
IUCB.L
Industrials
FRUC.L
-
IUCB.L
Real Estate
FRUC.L
-
IUCB.L
Utilities
FRUC.L
-
IUCB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRUC.L vs. IUCB.L — Risk / Return Rank
FRUC.L
IUCB.L
FRUC.L vs. IUCB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (FRUC.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-10 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IUCB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRUC.L | IUCB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.16 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 1.24 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.21 | 3.48 | -0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRUC.L | IUCB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 0.87 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.42 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.27 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
FRUC.L vs. IUCB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRUC.L drawdown since its inception was -17.34%, roughly equal to the maximum IUCB.L drawdown of -16.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRUC.L and IUCB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRUC.L | IUCB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.34% | -16.72% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.65% | -5.02% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.76% | -7.91% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.26% | -13.22% | -0.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.39% | -1.74% | -5.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.18% | -5.69% | -2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.78% | +0.17% |
Volatility
FRUC.L vs. IUCB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (FRUC.L) is 1.66%, while SPDR Bloomberg 1-10 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IUCB.L) has a volatility of 1.77%. This indicates that FRUC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUCB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRUC.L | IUCB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.66% | 1.77% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.57% | 5.19% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.20% | 7.16% | -0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.60% | 9.52% | -0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.61% | 12.33% | -2.72% |
FRUC.L vs. IUCB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRUC.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IUCB.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRUC.L vs. IUCB.L - Dividend Comparison
FRUC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than IUCB.L's 4.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRUC.L Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 4.01% | 4.02% | 4.19% | 3.44% | 2.71% | 2.13% | 2.42% | 3.45% | 1.64% |
IUCB.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-10 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 4.67% | 4.66% | 4.70% | 3.89% | 2.62% | 2.37% | 2.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRUC.L and IUCB.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUCB.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUCB.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FRUC.L.
Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FRUC.L and 0.12% for IUCB.L.
Find the right allocation for FRUC.L and IUCB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer