PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRUC.L vs. FVUB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRUC.L vs. FVUB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (FRUC.L) and Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRUC.L achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than FVUB.L's 14.58% return.


FRUC.L

1D
0.17%
1M
1.65%
YTD
0.15%
6M
-0.05%
1Y
6.26%
3Y*
2.25%
5Y*
1.25%
10Y*

FVUB.L

1D
-0.62%
1M
-9.72%
YTD
14.58%
6M
9.14%
1Y
36.63%
3Y*
10.68%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRUC.L vs. FVUB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FRUC.L
Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.15%0.24%3.75%1.75%-5.43%-1.01%6.06%2.82%
FVUB.L
Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF
14.58%35.51%-26.77%26.33%23.83%-15.44%-22.19%-14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FRUC.L and FVUB.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2019

0.03

FRUC.L vs. FVUB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FRUC.L
FVUB.L

Healthcare

3.2%
2.9%

Communication Services

1.3%
2.0%

Technology

1.2%
0.7%

Financial Services

0.7%
25.4%

Energy

0.5%
20.6%

Basic Materials

-

15.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.0%

Industrials

-

11.4%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Utilities

-

14.8%

Healthcare

FRUC.L
3.2%
FVUB.L
2.9%

Communication Services

FRUC.L
1.3%
FVUB.L
2.0%

Technology

FRUC.L
1.2%
FVUB.L
0.7%

Financial Services

FRUC.L
0.7%
FVUB.L
25.4%

Energy

FRUC.L
0.5%
FVUB.L
20.6%

Basic Materials

FRUC.L

-

FVUB.L
15.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FRUC.L

-

FVUB.L
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

FRUC.L

-

FVUB.L
4.0%

Industrials

FRUC.L

-

FVUB.L
11.4%

Real Estate

FRUC.L

-

FVUB.L
0.8%

Utilities

FRUC.L

-

FVUB.L
14.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRUC.L vs. FVUB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRUC.L
FRUC.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FRUC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRUC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRUC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FRUC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRUC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FVUB.L
FVUB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FVUB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRUC.L vs. FVUB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (FRUC.L) and Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRUC.LFVUB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.29

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

2.64

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.21

8.35

-5.14

FRUC.L vs. FVUB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRUC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the FVUB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRUC.L and FVUB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRUC.LFVUB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

1.67

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.28

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

-0.00

+0.25

Drawdowns

FRUC.L vs. FVUB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRUC.L drawdown since its inception was -17.34%, smaller than the maximum FVUB.L drawdown of -58.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRUC.L and FVUB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRUC.LFVUB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.34%

-58.22%

+40.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.65%

-13.83%

+9.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.76%

-27.50%

+18.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.26%

-29.42%

+16.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.39%

-13.83%

+6.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.18%

-27.79%

+19.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

4.38%

-2.43%

Volatility

FRUC.L vs. FVUB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (FRUC.L) is 1.66%, while Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L) has a volatility of 6.25%. This indicates that FRUC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVUB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRUC.LFVUB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

6.25%

-4.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.57%

18.17%

-13.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.20%

21.79%

-15.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.60%

25.57%

-16.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.61%

31.39%

-21.78%

FRUC.L vs. FVUB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRUC.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FVUB.L's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRUC.L vs. FVUB.L - Dividend Comparison

FRUC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, while FVUB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FRUC.L
Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
4.01%4.02%4.19%3.44%2.71%2.13%2.42%3.45%1.64%
FVUB.L
Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRUC.L and FVUB.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FVUB.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FVUB.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FRUC.L.

FRUC.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FVUB.L is Latin America Equities. FRUC.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while FVUB.L tracks MSCI Brazil NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FRUC.L and 0.19% for FVUB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRUC.L and FVUB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer