FRUC.L vs. FLXC.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (FRUC.L) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.L).
FRUC.L and FLXC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FRUC.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. It was launched on Jun 25, 2018. FLXC.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jun 4, 2019. Both FRUC.L and FLXC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FRUC.L vs. FLXC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRUC.L vs. FLXC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRUC.L Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.43% | 0.24% | 3.75% | 1.75% | -5.43% | -1.01% | 6.06% | 2.74% |
FLXC.L Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -4.31% | 22.74% | 21.44% | -17.10% | -13.73% | -19.73% | 27.37% | 11.38% |
Different Trading Currencies
FRUC.L is traded in GBP, while FLXC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLXC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRUC.L achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly higher than FLXC.L's -4.31% return.
FRUC.L
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 1.89%
- 3Y*
- 2.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- —
FLXC.L
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- -4.31%
- 6M
- -11.18%
- 1Y
- 4.46%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- -4.07%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRUC.L vs. FLXC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRUC.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXC.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRUC.L vs. FLXC.L — Risk / Return Rank
FRUC.L
FLXC.L
FRUC.L vs. FLXC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (FRUC.L) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRUC.L | FLXC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.25 | 0.21 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.40 | 0.44 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.05 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 0.56 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.70 | 1.50 | -0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRUC.L | FLXC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 0.21 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | -0.13 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.07 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRUC.L and FLXC.L is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
FRUC.L vs. FLXC.L - Dividend Comparison
FRUC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, while FLXC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRUC.L Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 4.00% | 4.02% | 4.19% | 3.44% | 2.71% | 2.13% | 2.42% | 3.45% | 1.64% |
FLXC.L Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FRUC.L vs. FLXC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRUC.L drawdown since its inception was -17.34%, smaller than the maximum FLXC.L drawdown of -64.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRUC.L and FLXC.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRUC.L | FLXC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.34% | -67.90% | +50.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.93% | -15.45% | +9.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.26% | -62.78% | +49.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.13% | -33.36% | +26.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.18% | -31.82% | +23.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 5.71% | -2.80% |
Volatility
FRUC.L vs. FLXC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (FRUC.L) is 2.27%, while Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.L) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that FRUC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRUC.L | FLXC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.27% | 6.31% | -4.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.68% | 13.29% | -8.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.42% | 20.80% | -13.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.67% | 31.61% | -22.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.68% | 29.98% | -20.30% |