PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRSTX vs. JMSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRSTX vs. JMSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Strategic Income Fund (FRSTX) and JPMorgan Income Fund Class I (JMSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRSTX achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than JMSIX's 1.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FRSTX has underperformed JMSIX with an annualized return of 2.32%, while JMSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.76% annualized return.


FRSTX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.08%
6M
-0.85%
YTD
-0.50%
1Y
2.09%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
1.09%
10Y*
2.32%
ALL TIME*
5.24%

JMSIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.47%
6M
0.74%
YTD
1.12%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
6.81%
5Y*
2.71%
10Y*
3.76%
ALL TIME*
2.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FRSTX vs. JMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRSTX
Franklin Strategic Income Fund
-0.50%5.97%3.28%8.44%-10.72%2.13%3.49%8.17%-1.87%4.50%
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund Class I
1.12%7.68%7.78%6.14%-8.24%3.59%3.07%11.82%1.03%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FRSTX and JMSIX is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014

0.70

The correlation between FRSTX and JMSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRSTX vs. JMSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FRSTX
FRSTX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FRSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FRSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

JMSIX
JMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
JMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
JMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FRSTX vs. JMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Strategic Income Fund (FRSTX) and JPMorgan Income Fund Class I (JMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRSTXJMSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.49

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

2.89

-1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.42

11.55

-9.12

FRSTX vs. JMSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRSTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the JMSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRSTX and JMSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRSTX vs. JMSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRSTX drawdown since its inception was -19.09%, roughly equal to the maximum JMSIX drawdown of -18.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRSTX and JMSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRSTXJMSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.09%

-18.40%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.95%

-1.62%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.40%

-2.25%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.83%

-11.39%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.63%

-18.40%

+0.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-0.59%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.05%

-2.54%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

0.41%

+0.76%

Volatility

FRSTX vs. JMSIX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Strategic Income Fund (FRSTX) has a higher volatility of 0.99% compared to JPMorgan Income Fund Class I (JMSIX) at 0.53%. This indicates that FRSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRSTXJMSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

0.53%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

1.94%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77%

2.50%

+1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.16%

3.73%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.15%

3.86%

+0.29%

FRSTX vs. JMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRSTX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than JMSIX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRSTX vs. JMSIX - Dividend Comparison

FRSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than JMSIX's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRSTX
Franklin Strategic Income Fund
3.97%3.36%4.74%4.56%4.36%3.62%3.93%4.47%4.32%2.25%2.48%4.81%
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund Class I
5.54%5.95%5.78%4.43%4.78%4.00%4.95%5.10%5.43%5.42%0.46%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRSTX and JMSIX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRSTX has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to JMSIX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRSTX dropped -19.09% vs JMSIX's -18.40%.

JMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRSTX and JMSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer