FRQX.L vs. LDAG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LDAG.L).
FRQX.L and LDAG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FRQX.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Sep 27, 2018. LDAG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. It was launched on Apr 12, 2021. Both FRQX.L and LDAG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FRQX.L vs. LDAG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRQX.L vs. LDAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRQX.L Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF | 10.58% | 21.13% | 9.39% | 5.79% | -2.53% | 1.33% |
LDAG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 11.09% | 26.41% | 5.50% | 3.28% | 1.73% | -0.75% |
Different Trading Currencies
FRQX.L is traded in GBP, while LDAG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LDAG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FRQX.L having a 10.58% return and LDAG.L slightly higher at 11.09%.
FRQX.L
- 1D
- 3.80%
- 1M
- -8.35%
- YTD
- 10.58%
- 6M
- 19.94%
- 1Y
- 43.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- —
LDAG.L
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- YTD
- 11.09%
- 6M
- 14.32%
- 1Y
- 41.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRQX.L vs. LDAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FRQX.L and LDAG.L have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Return for Risk
FRQX.L vs. LDAG.L — Risk / Return Rank
FRQX.L
LDAG.L
FRQX.L vs. LDAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LDAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRQX.L | LDAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.33 | 2.83 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.09 | 3.55 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.52 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 4.33 | -0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.56 | 13.11 | +0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRQX.L | LDAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.83 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.71 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRQX.L and LDAG.L is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FRQX.L vs. LDAG.L - Dividend Comparison
FRQX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDAG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRQX.L Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDAG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 3.94% | 4.23% | 4.75% | 5.40% | 4.80% | 2.19% |
Drawdowns
FRQX.L vs. LDAG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRQX.L drawdown since its inception was -20.77%, which is greater than LDAG.L's maximum drawdown of -14.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRQX.L and LDAG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRQX.L | LDAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.77% | -14.68% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.75% | -9.90% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.39% | -7.07% | -1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -4.34% | +0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 3.16% | +0.01% |
Volatility
FRQX.L vs. LDAG.L - Volatility Comparison
Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L) has a higher volatility of 9.54% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Asia Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (LDAG.L) at 4.89%. This indicates that FRQX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRQX.L | LDAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.54% | 4.89% | +4.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.51% | 10.09% | +4.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 14.57% | +3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.10% | 12.80% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 12.80% | +3.29% |