FRQX.L vs. CNUA.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

FRQX.L (Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF) and CNUA.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - FRQX.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while CNUA.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FRQX.L returned 12.76%/yr vs 2.41%/yr for CNUA.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FRQX.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CNUA.L.

Performance

FRQX.L vs. CNUA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CNUA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FRQX.L is traded in GBP, while CNUA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CNUA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRQX.L achieves a 30.16% return, which is significantly higher than CNUA.L's 4.26% return.

FRQX.L

• 1D: -1.71%
• 1M: -11.87%
• 6M: 22.09%
• YTD: 30.16%
• 1Y: 47.75%
• 3Y*: 23.21%
• 5Y*: 12.76%
• 10Y*: —

CNUA.L

• 1D: -3.12%
• 1M: -8.58%
• 6M: 0.39%
• YTD: 4.26%
• 1Y: 26.51%
• 3Y*: 11.98%
• 5Y*: 2.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRQX.L vs. CNUA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FRQX.L Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF	30.16%	21.14%	9.38%	5.79%	-2.53%	5.94%	3.91%
CNUA.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	4.26%	22.98%	16.55%	-16.32%	-14.88%	9.25%	8.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FRQX.L and CNUA.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2020	0.49

The correlation between FRQX.L and CNUA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (3 years) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FRQX.L vs. CNUA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FRQX.L	CNUA.L
Technology	57.8%	31.4%
Financial Services	14.7%	17.9%
Industrials	8.0%	15.2%
Consumer Cyclical	4.5%	5.3%
Basic Materials	3.1%	11.2%
Communication Services	2.2%	1.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	6.8%
Healthcare	2.0%	3.9%
Energy	2.0%	3.2%
Utilities	1.9%	3.4%
Real Estate	1.7%	0.5%

Return for Risk

FRQX.L vs. CNUA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRQX.L

FRQX.L Risk / Return Rank: 80
FRQX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FRQX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FRQX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FRQX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FRQX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

CNUA.L

CNUA.L Risk / Return Rank: 59
CNUA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
CNUA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
CNUA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
CNUA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
CNUA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRQX.L vs. CNUA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CNUA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FRQX.L	CNUA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	1.46	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	2.02	+0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.26	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	2.28	+0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.08	9.41	+1.67

FRQX.L vs. CNUA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRQX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the CNUA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRQX.L and CNUA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FRQX.L vs. CNUA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRQX.L drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, smaller than the maximum CNUA.L drawdown of -38.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRQX.L and CNUA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRQX.L	CNUA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.92%	-38.31%	+2.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.65%	-11.60%	-4.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.00%	-30.45%	+7.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.00%	-38.31%	+15.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.65%	-11.60%	-4.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.44%	-15.74%	+0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.30%	2.81%	+1.49%

Volatility

FRQX.L vs. CNUA.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L) has a higher volatility of 11.01% compared to UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CNUA.L) at 8.77%. This indicates that FRQX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNUA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRQX.L	CNUA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.01%	8.77%	+2.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.03%	13.62%	+7.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.96%	18.07%	+4.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.98%	25.28%	-4.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.50%	26.97%	-5.47%

FRQX.L vs. CNUA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRQX.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CNUA.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRQX.L vs. CNUA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FRQX.L nor CNUA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRQX.L and CNUA.L in my portfolio?

FRQX.L and CNUA.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FRQX.L or CNUA.L?

On fees, CNUA.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FRQX.L or CNUA.L?

CNUA.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FRQX.L.

What is the main difference between FRQX.L and CNUA.L?

FRQX.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while CNUA.L is China Equities. FRQX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while CNUA.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FRQX.L and 0.30% for CNUA.L.