FRPAX vs. LSMSX
FRPAX (Franklin Pennsylvania Tax-Free Income Fund) and LSMSX (Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds from Franklin Templeton. Over the past 5 years, FRPAX returned 0.09%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LSMSX. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FRPAX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LSMSX.
Performance
FRPAX vs. LSMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRPAX achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than LSMSX's 1.12% return.
FRPAX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- 6M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 6.03%
- 3Y*
- 3.49%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.96%
LSMSX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 6.64%
- 3Y*
- 3.47%
- 5Y*
- 0.70%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FRPAX vs. LSMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRPAX Franklin Pennsylvania Tax-Free Income Fund | 0.34% | 4.42% | 2.66% | 6.18% | -11.68% | 1.93% | 4.37% | 5.96% | 1.41% | 1.88% |
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | 1.12% | 3.22% | 2.22% | 7.96% | -10.03% | 4.11% | 4.48% | 8.16% | 0.46% | 4.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRPAX and LSMSX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.81 |
The correlation between FRPAX and LSMSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRPAX vs. LSMSX — Risk / Return Rank
FRPAX
LSMSX
FRPAX vs. LSMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Pennsylvania Tax-Free Income Fund (FRPAX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRPAX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.63 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 2.65 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.55 | 8.88 | -1.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRPAX vs. LSMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRPAX drawdown since its inception was -18.67%, which is greater than LSMSX's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRPAX and LSMSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRPAX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.67% | -15.00% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.25% | -2.82% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.95% | -7.49% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.94% | -14.92% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -1.78% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -2.81% | +0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.84% | +0.10% |
Volatility
FRPAX vs. LSMSX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Pennsylvania Tax-Free Income Fund (FRPAX) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) at 1.01%. This indicates that FRPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRPAX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 1.01% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 2.28% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.48% | 2.89% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.70% | 4.51% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.94% | 4.48% | -0.54% |
FRPAX vs. LSMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRPAX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMSX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRPAX vs. LSMSX - Dividend Comparison
FRPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than LSMSX's 3.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRPAX Franklin Pennsylvania Tax-Free Income Fund | 3.20% | 4.47% | 3.76% | 2.73% | 2.58% | 2.21% | 2.73% | 3.84% | 3.65% | 3.49% | 3.75% | 3.93% |
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | 3.94% | 3.83% | 4.30% | 3.37% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 2.55% | 2.34% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRPAX and LSMSX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRPAX has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to LSMSX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRPAX dropped -18.67% vs LSMSX's -15.00%.
LSMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRPAX and LSMSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer