PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRNJX vs. MUC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRNJX vs. MUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin New Jersey Tax Free Income Fund (FRNJX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRNJX achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly lower than MUC's 7.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FRNJX has outperformed MUC with an annualized return of 1.92%, while MUC has yielded a comparatively lower 0.90% annualized return.


FRNJX

1D
0.27%
1M
0.95%
6M
2.60%
YTD
2.60%
1Y
7.53%
3Y*
4.37%
5Y*
0.98%
10Y*
1.92%

MUC

1D
0.18%
1M
2.74%
6M
7.01%
YTD
7.01%
1Y
12.85%
3Y*
6.17%
5Y*
-2.38%
10Y*
0.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRNJX vs. MUC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRNJX
Franklin New Jersey Tax Free Income Fund
2.60%4.25%3.00%6.24%-10.70%2.42%4.03%7.02%1.54%2.31%
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
7.01%5.96%0.76%7.86%-26.81%7.38%11.85%18.12%-9.00%6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FRNJX and MUC is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 1998

0.27

The correlation between FRNJX and MUC shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.48 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRNJX vs. MUC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRNJX
FRNJX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FRNJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRNJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRNJX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FRNJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRNJX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

MUC
MUC Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUC Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUC Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRNJX vs. MUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin New Jersey Tax Free Income Fund (FRNJX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRNJXMUCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.30

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

1.98

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.47

8.02

+2.45

FRNJX vs. MUC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRNJX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the MUC Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRNJX and MUC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRNJX vs. MUC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRNJX drawdown since its inception was -15.53%, smaller than the maximum MUC drawdown of -48.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRNJX and MUC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRNJXMUCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.53%

-48.97%

+33.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-6.53%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.19%

-14.51%

+8.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.53%

-38.29%

+22.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.53%

-38.29%

+22.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-14.13%

+14.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.83%

-9.92%

+8.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

1.61%

-0.89%

Volatility

FRNJX vs. MUC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin New Jersey Tax Free Income Fund (FRNJX) is 0.46%, while BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) has a volatility of 2.02%. This indicates that FRNJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRNJXMUCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

2.02%

-1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.16%

6.30%

-4.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87%

8.19%

-5.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.16%

11.51%

-7.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.99%

11.90%

-7.91%

FRNJX vs. MUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRNJX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than MUC's 2.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRNJX vs. MUC - Dividend Comparison

FRNJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than MUC's 5.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRNJX
Franklin New Jersey Tax Free Income Fund
3.19%4.18%3.63%2.76%2.83%2.48%2.60%3.47%3.59%3.44%3.95%3.88%
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
5.83%6.06%5.62%3.84%5.79%4.27%3.96%3.90%4.99%5.14%5.45%5.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRNJX and MUC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUC has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to FRNJX (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRNJX dropped -15.53% vs MUC's -48.97%.

FRNJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRNJX and MUC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer