PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRNH.DE vs. QDVY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRNH.DE vs. QDVY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi USD Floating Rate Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (FRNH.DE) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (QDVY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRNH.DE achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than QDVY.DE's 5.04% return.


FRNH.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
6M
1.33%
YTD
1.35%
1Y
2.90%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
1.21%

QDVY.DE

1D
0.23%
1M
1.85%
6M
4.80%
YTD
5.04%
1Y
7.69%
3Y*
3.93%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRNH.DE vs. QDVY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRNH.DE
Amundi USD Floating Rate Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
1.35%2.90%4.99%4.33%-0.84%-0.64%-0.04%2.05%-2.60%-0.08%
QDVY.DE
iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF
5.04%-6.57%12.71%2.90%7.46%9.00%-8.10%6.74%5.86%-15.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FRNH.DE and QDVY.DE is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2017

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRNH.DE vs. QDVY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRNH.DE
FRNH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FRNH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRNH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRNH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FRNH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRNH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVY.DE
QDVY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
QDVY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRNH.DE vs. QDVY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi USD Floating Rate Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (FRNH.DE) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (QDVY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRNH.DEQDVY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.90

1.23

+0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.08

2.38

+5.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

39.13

5.76

+33.37

FRNH.DE vs. QDVY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRNH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is higher than the QDVY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRNH.DE and QDVY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRNH.DE vs. QDVY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRNH.DE drawdown since its inception was -15.25%, smaller than the maximum QDVY.DE drawdown of -19.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRNH.DE and QDVY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRNH.DEQDVY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.25%

-19.19%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.36%

-3.21%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.39%

-11.29%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-3.19%

-11.29%

+8.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.24%

+4.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.87%

-7.36%

+6.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

1.33%

-1.26%

Volatility

FRNH.DE vs. QDVY.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi USD Floating Rate Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (FRNH.DE) is 0.10%, while iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (QDVY.DE) has a volatility of 1.97%. This indicates that FRNH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRNH.DEQDVY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.10%

1.97%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.71%

4.37%

-3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90%

6.11%

-5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.42%

7.84%

-5.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.36%

9.02%

-5.66%

FRNH.DE vs. QDVY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRNH.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVY.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FRNH.DE vs. QDVY.DE - Dividend Comparison

FRNH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDVY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRNH.DE
Amundi USD Floating Rate Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDVY.DE
iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF
4.61%5.18%5.89%5.61%1.50%0.57%1.75%2.94%2.20%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRNH.DE and QDVY.DE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVY.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVY.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for FRNH.DE.

FRNH.DE tracks iBoxx MSCI ESG USD FRN Investment Grade Corporates Index (EUR Hedged), while QDVY.DE tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes 1-5. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FRNH.DE and 0.10% for QDVY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRNH.DE and QDVY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer