PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRMCX vs. VRTVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRMCX vs. VRTVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin MicroCap Value Fund (FRMCX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRMCX achieves a 12.94% return, which is significantly lower than VRTVX's 19.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FRMCX has outperformed VRTVX with an annualized return of 11.90%, while VRTVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.37% annualized return.


FRMCX

1D
0.51%
1M
1.26%
YTD
12.94%
6M
12.32%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
11.90%

VRTVX

1D
1.38%
1M
1.15%
YTD
19.06%
6M
18.22%
1Y
44.10%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRMCX vs. VRTVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRMCX
Franklin MicroCap Value Fund
12.94%7.25%8.47%11.72%0.62%29.86%3.70%44.38%-17.82%8.39%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
19.06%12.21%8.07%14.71%-14.52%28.06%4.81%22.40%-12.83%7.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FRMCX and VRTVX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.93

The correlation between FRMCX and VRTVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRMCX vs. VRTVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRMCX
FRMCX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FRMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FRMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTVX
VRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRMCX vs. VRTVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin MicroCap Value Fund (FRMCX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRMCXVRTVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.41

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

5.18

-3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.49

17.57

-11.08

FRMCX vs. VRTVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the VRTVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRMCX and VRTVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRMCXVRTVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.46

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.32

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.44

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.48

+0.13

Drawdowns

FRMCX vs. VRTVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRMCX drawdown since its inception was -56.77%, which is greater than VRTVX's maximum drawdown of -45.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRMCX and VRTVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRMCXVRTVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.77%

-45.98%

-10.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.52%

-8.54%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.84%

-26.85%

-5.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.84%

-26.85%

-5.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.50%

-45.98%

+2.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-0.15%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-7.77%

-0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

2.51%

+1.59%

Volatility

FRMCX vs. VRTVX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin MicroCap Value Fund (FRMCX) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) at 4.97%. This indicates that FRMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRTVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRMCXVRTVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

4.97%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.30%

12.09%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

17.99%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.12%

21.68%

+2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.97%

23.71%

+1.26%

FRMCX vs. VRTVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRMCX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRMCX vs. VRTVX - Dividend Comparison

FRMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.50%, more than VRTVX's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRMCX
Franklin MicroCap Value Fund
13.50%15.24%25.34%5.16%6.09%17.71%5.63%36.24%6.75%7.74%8.86%13.59%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.58%1.49%1.84%2.08%2.15%1.56%1.54%1.87%2.17%1.74%1.52%2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FRMCX and VRTVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRMCX has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to VRTVX (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRMCX dropped -56.77% vs VRTVX's -45.98%.

VRTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRMCX and VRTVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer