FRMCX vs. FIKNX
FRMCX (Franklin MicroCap Value Fund) and FIKNX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FRMCX returned 9.13%/yr vs 10.77%/yr for FIKNX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FRMCX charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for FIKNX.
Performance
FRMCX vs. FIKNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRMCX achieves a 13.20% return, which is significantly lower than FIKNX's 26.59% return.
FRMCX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- 6M
- 7.12%
- YTD
- 13.20%
- 1Y
- 20.96%
- 3Y*
- 13.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
FIKNX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- 6M
- 19.82%
- YTD
- 26.59%
- 1Y
- 37.61%
- 3Y*
- 17.09%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- —
FRMCX vs. FIKNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRMCX Franklin MicroCap Value Fund | 13.20% | 7.25% | 8.47% | 11.72% | 0.62% | 29.86% | 3.70% | 44.38% | -14.73% |
FIKNX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z | 26.59% | 8.18% | 8.00% | 17.97% | -12.98% | 38.27% | 11.35% | 20.98% | -13.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRMCX and FIKNX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FRMCX and FIKNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRMCX vs. FIKNX — Risk / Return Rank
FRMCX
FIKNX
FRMCX vs. FIKNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin MicroCap Value Fund (FRMCX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIKNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRMCX | FIKNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.33 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 3.35 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.53 | 11.74 | -7.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRMCX vs. FIKNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRMCX drawdown since its inception was -56.77%, which is greater than FIKNX's maximum drawdown of -44.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRMCX and FIKNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRMCX | FIKNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.77% | -44.09% | -12.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.52% | -10.35% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.84% | -24.87% | -7.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.84% | -24.87% | -7.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -1.67% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.70% | -7.56% | -1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.11% | 2.95% | +1.16% |
Volatility
FRMCX vs. FIKNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin MicroCap Value Fund (FRMCX) is 3.81%, while Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIKNX) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that FRMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIKNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRMCX | FIKNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 4.26% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.41% | 13.48% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.46% | 18.03% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 20.93% | +3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.97% | 24.54% | +0.43% |
FRMCX vs. FIKNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRMCX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKNX's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRMCX vs. FIKNX - Dividend Comparison
FRMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.46%, more than FIKNX's 8.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKNX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z | 8.09% | 10.24% | 4.82% | 5.32% | 5.92% | 8.07% | 0.58% | 3.65% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FRMCX Franklin MicroCap Value Fund | 13.46% | 15.24% | 25.34% | 5.16% | 6.09% | 17.71% | 5.63% | 36.24% | 6.75% | 7.74% | 8.86% | 13.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, FRMCX and FIKNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FIKNX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to FRMCX (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRMCX dropped -56.77% vs FIKNX's -44.09%.
FIKNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRMCX and FIKNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer