PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRIOX vs. FRINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRIOX vs. FRINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class C (FRIOX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRIOX achieves a 3.13% return, which is significantly lower than FRINX's 3.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FRIOX has underperformed FRINX with an annualized return of 4.32%, while FRINX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.06% annualized return.


FRIOX

1D
-0.33%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
3.13%
6M
3.56%
1Y
7.07%
3Y*
7.34%
5Y*
2.56%
10Y*
4.32%

FRINX

1D
-0.40%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
3.44%
6M
3.90%
1Y
7.87%
3Y*
8.14%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
5.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRIOX vs. FRINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRIOX
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class C
3.13%6.06%6.79%8.31%-15.51%17.80%-2.13%16.74%-2.56%5.39%
FRINX
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A
3.44%6.87%7.61%9.01%-14.79%18.64%-1.36%17.52%-1.93%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FRIOX and FRINX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2010

0.98

The correlation between FRIOX and FRINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRIOX vs. FRINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRIOX
FRIOX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FRIOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRIOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRIOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FRIOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRIOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FRINX
FRINX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FRINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRINX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FRINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRINX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRIOX vs. FRINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class C (FRIOX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRIOXFRINXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

1.94

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

2.79

-0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.26

-0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.67

10.01

-1.34

FRIOX vs. FRINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRIOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the FRINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRIOX and FRINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRIOXFRINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

1.94

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.51

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.53

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.77

-0.09

Drawdowns

FRIOX vs. FRINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRIOX drawdown since its inception was -34.54%, roughly equal to the maximum FRINX drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIOX and FRINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRIOXFRINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.54%

-34.50%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.51%

-3.45%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.50%

-7.27%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.83%

-18.30%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.54%

-34.50%

-0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-0.56%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.63%

-3.38%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.78%

+0.04%

Volatility

FRIOX vs. FRINX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class C (FRIOX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX) have volatilities of 1.18% and 1.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRIOXFRINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

1.19%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.15%

3.12%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07%

4.03%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.51%

6.49%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.49%

9.50%

-0.01%

FRIOX vs. FRINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRIOX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FRINX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRIOX vs. FRINX - Dividend Comparison

FRIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than FRINX's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRINX
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A
4.29%4.40%4.41%4.78%5.80%1.31%4.53%5.45%4.89%4.21%4.77%3.53%
FRIOX
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class C
3.59%3.68%3.68%4.09%5.00%1.02%3.92%4.76%4.46%3.69%4.05%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FRIOX and FRINX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRINX has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to FRIOX (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRIOX dropped -34.54% vs FRINX's -34.50%.

FRINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRIOX and FRINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer