FRINX vs. AWP
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX) and abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP).
FRINX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 14, 2010. AWP is an actively managed fund by abrdn. It was launched on Feb 13, 2007.
Performance
FRINX vs. AWP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRINX vs. AWP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | 0.25% | 6.87% | 7.61% | 9.01% | -14.79% | 18.64% | -1.36% | 17.52% | -1.93% | 6.00% |
AWP abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund | 1.75% | 12.43% | 12.23% | 12.58% | -37.13% | 40.41% | -10.29% | 42.52% | -18.47% | 44.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRINX achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than AWP's 1.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FRINX has underperformed AWP with an annualized return of 5.05%, while AWP has yielded a comparatively higher 6.94% annualized return.
FRINX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- 7.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- 5.05%
AWP
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 11.28%
- 3Y*
- 10.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.93%
- 10Y*
- 6.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRINX vs. AWP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRINX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than AWP's 1.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRINX vs. AWP — Risk / Return Rank
FRINX
AWP
FRINX vs. AWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX) and abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRINX | AWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 0.52 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.15 | 0.83 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.12 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 0.76 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.98 | 3.03 | +0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRINX | AWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.52 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.09 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.30 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.06 | +0.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRINX and AWP is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FRINX vs. AWP - Dividend Comparison
FRINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than AWP's 12.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | 4.39% | 4.40% | 4.41% | 4.78% | 5.80% | 1.31% | 4.53% | 5.45% | 4.89% | 4.21% | 4.77% | 3.53% |
AWP abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund | 12.66% | 12.50% | 12.44% | 12.37% | 12.31% | 7.02% | 9.13% | 8.49% | 12.05% | 8.90% | 11.70% | 10.40% |
Drawdowns
FRINX vs. AWP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRINX drawdown since its inception was -34.50%, smaller than the maximum AWP drawdown of -85.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRINX and AWP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRINX | AWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.50% | -85.93% | +51.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.45% | -14.14% | +10.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.30% | -43.93% | +25.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.50% | -53.95% | +19.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | -9.12% | +6.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.41% | -27.59% | +24.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 3.58% | -2.52% |
Volatility
FRINX vs. AWP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX) is 1.77%, while abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that FRINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRINX | AWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.77% | 7.03% | -5.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | 10.82% | -7.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.96% | 18.89% | -13.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.51% | 22.21% | -15.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.50% | 23.59% | -14.09% |