PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRIN.L vs. PAXJ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRIN.L vs. PAXJ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (PAXJ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FRIN.L is traded in GBP, while PAXJ.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PAXJ.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRIN.L achieves a -10.53% return, which is significantly lower than PAXJ.L's 9.14% return.


FRIN.L

1D
1.44%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
-10.53%
6M
-10.61%
1Y
-9.00%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*

PAXJ.L

1D
-0.86%
1M
0.41%
YTD
9.14%
6M
10.33%
1Y
19.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRIN.L vs. PAXJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FRIN.L
Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF
-10.53%-4.08%5.05%
PAXJ.L
Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF
9.14%12.28%7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FRIN.L and PAXJ.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.18

FRIN.L vs. PAXJ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FRIN.L
PAXJ.L

Financial Services

27.1%
46.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
6.0%

Industrials

10.3%
8.5%

Energy

9.5%
2.9%

Basic Materials

9.2%
14.6%

Technology

8.4%
1.1%

Healthcare

6.5%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
3.0%

Utilities

5.3%
3.6%

Communication Services

4.6%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.3%
7.8%

Financial Services

FRIN.L
27.1%
PAXJ.L
46.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FRIN.L
12.0%
PAXJ.L
6.0%

Industrials

FRIN.L
10.3%
PAXJ.L
8.5%

Energy

FRIN.L
9.5%
PAXJ.L
2.9%

Basic Materials

FRIN.L
9.2%
PAXJ.L
14.6%

Technology

FRIN.L
8.4%
PAXJ.L
1.1%

Healthcare

FRIN.L
6.5%
PAXJ.L
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

FRIN.L
5.8%
PAXJ.L
3.0%

Utilities

FRIN.L
5.3%
PAXJ.L
3.6%

Communication Services

FRIN.L
4.6%
PAXJ.L
2.7%

Real Estate

FRIN.L
1.3%
PAXJ.L
7.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRIN.L vs. PAXJ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRIN.L
FRIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FRIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FRIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

PAXJ.L
PAXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PAXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRIN.L vs. PAXJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (PAXJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRIN.LPAXJ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.42

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

4.99

-5.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.14

12.84

-13.97

FRIN.L vs. PAXJ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRIN.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the PAXJ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRIN.L and PAXJ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRIN.LPAXJ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.64

2.37

-3.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

1.70

-1.38

Drawdowns

FRIN.L vs. PAXJ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRIN.L drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, which is greater than PAXJ.L's maximum drawdown of -17.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIN.L and PAXJ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRIN.LPAXJ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-17.40%

-18.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.95%

-7.11%

-10.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.75%

-2.85%

-15.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-2.59%

-4.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.91%

Volatility

FRIN.L vs. PAXJ.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (PAXJ.L) at 4.28%. This indicates that FRIN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRIN.LPAXJ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.74%

4.28%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.82%

10.08%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

15.02%

-0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.52%

24.15%

-8.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.41%

24.15%

-4.74%

FRIN.L vs. PAXJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRIN.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXJ.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FRIN.L vs. PAXJ.L - Dividend Comparison

FRIN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAXJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%.


PositionTTM20252024
FRIN.L
Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAXJ.L
Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF
3.08%3.34%5.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRIN.L and PAXJ.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAXJ.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAXJ.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FRIN.L.

FRIN.L tracks MSCI India NR USD, while PAXJ.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FRIN.L and 0.12% for PAXJ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRIN.L and PAXJ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer