PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRIN.L vs. INFR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRIN.L vs. INFR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FRIN.L is traded in GBP, while INFR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INFR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRIN.L achieves a -6.03% return, which is significantly lower than INFR.L's 13.19% return.


FRIN.L

1D
-0.60%
1M
4.24%
YTD
-6.03%
6M
-5.72%
1Y
-5.75%
3Y*
5.83%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*

INFR.L

1D
0.49%
1M
1.11%
YTD
13.19%
6M
14.12%
1Y
21.65%
3Y*
10.72%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
7.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRIN.L vs. INFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FRIN.L
Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF
-6.03%-4.10%12.61%14.75%3.17%26.55%9.19%-4.64%
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
13.19%5.13%10.76%-5.53%5.25%18.61%-5.27%2.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FRIN.L and INFR.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between FRIN.L and INFR.L has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FRIN.L vs. INFR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FRIN.L
INFR.L

Financial Services

27.7%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%

-

Industrials

10.8%
21.5%

Basic Materials

9.2%

-

Energy

8.9%
16.2%

Technology

8.0%
1.1%

Healthcare

6.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.6%

-

Utilities

5.2%
54.9%

Communication Services

4.6%
1.1%

Real Estate

1.3%
5.3%

Financial Services

FRIN.L
27.7%
INFR.L
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FRIN.L
12.2%
INFR.L

-

Industrials

FRIN.L
10.8%
INFR.L
21.5%

Basic Materials

FRIN.L
9.2%
INFR.L

-

Energy

FRIN.L
8.9%
INFR.L
16.2%

Technology

FRIN.L
8.0%
INFR.L
1.1%

Healthcare

FRIN.L
6.7%
INFR.L

-

Consumer Defensive

FRIN.L
5.6%
INFR.L

-

Utilities

FRIN.L
5.2%
INFR.L
54.9%

Communication Services

FRIN.L
4.6%
INFR.L
1.1%

Real Estate

FRIN.L
1.3%
INFR.L
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRIN.L vs. INFR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRIN.L
FRIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FRIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FRIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

INFR.L
INFR.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
INFR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
INFR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRIN.L vs. INFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRIN.LINFR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.35

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

4.16

-4.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.68

10.00

-10.68

FRIN.L vs. INFR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRIN.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the INFR.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRIN.L and INFR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRIN.L vs. INFR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRIN.L drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, smaller than the maximum INFR.L drawdown of -64.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIN.L and INFR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRIN.LINFR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-64.87%

+28.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.97%

-5.19%

-12.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.37%

-11.19%

-11.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.37%

-23.29%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.67%

-0.31%

-14.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.23%

-24.43%

+17.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.47%

2.16%

+6.31%

Volatility

FRIN.L vs. INFR.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) at 4.37%. This indicates that FRIN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRIN.LINFR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

4.37%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.03%

8.94%

+3.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.33%

10.74%

+3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.64%

12.30%

+3.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.38%

14.00%

+5.38%

FRIN.L vs. INFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRIN.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRIN.L vs. INFR.L - Dividend Comparison

FRIN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INFR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRIN.L
Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.02%2.25%2.32%2.43%2.05%1.89%2.21%2.15%2.27%2.72%2.57%3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRIN.L and INFR.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FRIN.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FRIN.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.

FRIN.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while INFR.L is Utilities Equities. FRIN.L tracks MSCI India NR USD, while INFR.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FRIN.L and 0.65% for INFR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRIN.L and INFR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer