FRIN.L vs. INFR.L
FRIN.L (Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF) and INFR.L (iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - FRIN.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India NR USD, while INFR.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FRIN.L returned 6.33%/yr vs 7.62%/yr for INFR.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FRIN.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INFR.L.
Performance
FRIN.L vs. INFR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FRIN.L is traded in GBP, while INFR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INFR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRIN.L achieves a -6.03% return, which is significantly lower than INFR.L's 13.19% return.
FRIN.L
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- -6.03%
- 6M
- -5.72%
- 1Y
- -5.75%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- —
INFR.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 13.19%
- 6M
- 14.12%
- 1Y
- 21.65%
- 3Y*
- 10.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 7.62%
FRIN.L vs. INFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRIN.L Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF | -6.03% | -4.10% | 12.61% | 14.75% | 3.17% | 26.55% | 9.19% | -4.64% |
INFR.L iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 13.19% | 5.13% | 10.76% | -5.53% | 5.25% | 18.61% | -5.27% | 2.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRIN.L and INFR.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FRIN.L and INFR.L has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FRIN.L vs. INFR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FRIN.L
INFR.L
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
FRIN.L
INFR.L
Consumer Cyclical
FRIN.L
INFR.L
-
Industrials
FRIN.L
INFR.L
Basic Materials
FRIN.L
INFR.L
-
Energy
FRIN.L
INFR.L
Technology
FRIN.L
INFR.L
Healthcare
FRIN.L
INFR.L
-
Consumer Defensive
FRIN.L
INFR.L
-
Utilities
FRIN.L
INFR.L
Communication Services
FRIN.L
INFR.L
Real Estate
FRIN.L
INFR.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRIN.L vs. INFR.L — Risk / Return Rank
FRIN.L
INFR.L
FRIN.L vs. INFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRIN.L | INFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.35 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 4.16 | -4.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | 10.00 | -10.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRIN.L vs. INFR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRIN.L drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, smaller than the maximum INFR.L drawdown of -64.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIN.L and INFR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRIN.L | INFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.20% | -64.87% | +28.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.97% | -5.19% | -12.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.37% | -11.19% | -11.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.37% | -23.29% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.67% | -0.31% | -14.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.23% | -24.43% | +17.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.47% | 2.16% | +6.31% |
Volatility
FRIN.L vs. INFR.L - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) at 4.37%. This indicates that FRIN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRIN.L | INFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 4.37% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.03% | 8.94% | +3.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.33% | 10.74% | +3.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.64% | 12.30% | +3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 14.00% | +5.38% |
FRIN.L vs. INFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRIN.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRIN.L vs. INFR.L - Dividend Comparison
FRIN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INFR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRIN.L Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INFR.L iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 2.43% | 2.05% | 1.89% | 2.21% | 2.15% | 2.27% | 2.72% | 2.57% | 3.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRIN.L and INFR.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FRIN.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FRIN.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.
FRIN.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while INFR.L is Utilities Equities. FRIN.L tracks MSCI India NR USD, while INFR.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FRIN.L and 0.65% for INFR.L.
Find the right allocation for FRIN.L and INFR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer