PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRI vs. REM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRI vs. REM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund (FRI) and iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRI achieves a 11.66% return, which is significantly higher than REM's -0.88% return. Over the past 10 years, FRI has outperformed REM with an annualized return of 5.60%, while REM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.68% annualized return.


FRI

1D
0.38%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
11.66%
6M
10.48%
1Y
14.05%
3Y*
11.01%
5Y*
4.35%
10Y*
5.60%

REM

1D
0.18%
1M
-5.58%
YTD
-0.88%
6M
-0.09%
1Y
14.83%
3Y*
8.45%
5Y*
-2.13%
10Y*
2.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRI vs. REM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRI
First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund
11.66%2.80%7.84%13.33%-24.66%42.55%-7.90%23.67%-4.28%3.86%
REM
iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF
-0.88%13.30%-1.00%14.43%-27.56%16.14%-19.99%21.34%-3.09%18.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FRI and REM is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.63

The correlation between FRI and REM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

FRI vs. REM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FRI
REM

Real Estate

96.2%
97.2%

Financial Services

2.3%
2.4%

Utilities

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Real Estate

FRI
96.2%
REM
97.2%

Financial Services

FRI
2.3%
REM
2.4%

Utilities

FRI
0.8%
REM

-

Basic Materials

FRI

-

REM

-

Communication Services

FRI

-

REM

-

Consumer Cyclical

FRI

-

REM

-

Consumer Defensive

FRI

-

REM

-

Energy

FRI

-

REM

-

Healthcare

FRI

-

REM

-

Industrials

FRI

-

REM

-

Technology

FRI

-

REM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRI vs. REM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRI
FRI Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRI Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRI Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

REM
REM Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
REM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
REM Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
REM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
REM Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRI vs. REM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund (FRI) and iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRIREMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

0.89

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.52

1.30

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.16

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

0.94

+0.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.00

2.72

+3.28

FRI vs. REM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRI Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the REM Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRI and REM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRIREMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

0.89

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

-0.09

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.10

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

-0.04

+0.22

Drawdowns

FRI vs. REM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRI drawdown since its inception was -71.95%, roughly equal to the maximum REM drawdown of -74.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRI and REM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRIREMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.95%

-74.73%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.57%

-14.25%

+6.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-21.91%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.21%

-43.31%

+12.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.16%

-68.52%

+24.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.44%

-22.90%

+19.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.70%

-38.35%

+24.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

4.91%

-2.54%

Volatility

FRI vs. REM - Volatility Comparison

First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund (FRI) and iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM) have volatilities of 3.99% and 4.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRIREMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

4.09%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.21%

12.95%

-3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

16.86%

-3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.65%

23.56%

-4.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.06%

28.27%

-7.21%

FRI vs. REM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRI has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than REM's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRI vs. REM - Dividend Comparison

FRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than REM's 9.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRI
First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund
2.60%2.99%3.33%3.24%2.52%1.44%3.08%2.28%3.21%2.82%3.27%2.66%
REM
iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF
9.07%8.70%9.61%9.46%11.13%7.29%7.72%8.16%10.00%9.97%10.03%11.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRI and REM have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REM has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to FRI (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRI dropped -71.95% vs REM's -74.73%.

On 10-year performance, FRI leads with 5.60% vs 2.68% for REM. On fees, REM is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, FRI has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FRI has performed better with a 5.60% return vs 2.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REM is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FRI.

REM has the higher dividend yield at 9.07%, compared with 2.60% for FRI.

FRI tracks S&P United States REIT, while REM tracks FTSE NAREIT All Mortgage Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FRI and 0.48% for REM.

FRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRI and REM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer