PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRHIX vs. NMHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRHIX vs. NMHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin High Yield Tax Free Income Fund (FRHIX) and Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FRHIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-2.44%
6M
0.52%
YTD
1.35%
1Y
6.88%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
0.86%
10Y*
2.39%
ALL TIME*
4.70%

NMHIX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FRHIX vs. NMHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRHIX
Franklin High Yield Tax Free Income Fund
1.35%5.33%7.28%6.01%-13.96%4.89%5.87%8.35%1.96%3.40%
NMHIX
Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund
0.48%3.56%6.27%4.34%-14.26%4.90%4.04%8.28%2.19%8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FRHIX and NMHIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.83

The correlation between FRHIX and NMHIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRHIX vs. NMHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FRHIX
FRHIX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FRHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FRHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

NMHIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FRHIX vs. NMHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin High Yield Tax Free Income Fund (FRHIX) and Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRHIXNMHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.27

FRHIX vs. NMHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRHIX vs. NMHIX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRHIXNMHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

Volatility

FRHIX vs. NMHIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRHIXNMHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.67%

FRHIX vs. NMHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRHIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than NMHIX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRHIX vs. NMHIX - Dividend Comparison

FRHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than NMHIX's 3.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRHIX
Franklin High Yield Tax Free Income Fund
4.27%5.79%5.32%4.16%4.27%3.61%3.83%4.99%4.46%4.06%4.42%4.27%
NMHIX
Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund
3.46%3.98%3.81%3.11%2.43%2.74%2.90%3.36%3.64%3.44%4.42%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRHIX and NMHIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRHIX and NMHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer