FREL vs. DFAR
FREL (Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF) and DFAR (Dimensional US Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. FREL is passively managed, while DFAR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FREL returned 9.05%/yr vs 9.64%/yr for DFAR. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FREL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for DFAR.
Performance
FREL vs. DFAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FREL achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than DFAR's 11.46% return.
FREL
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 9.81%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.09%
- 10Y*
- 5.67%
DFAR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 11.46%
- 6M
- 10.41%
- 1Y
- 11.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FREL vs. DFAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FREL Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF | 7.59% | 3.09% | 5.05% | 11.74% | -15.78% |
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF | 11.46% | 1.31% | 5.25% | 11.04% | -14.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between FREL and DFAR is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.99 |
The correlation between FREL and DFAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
FREL vs. DFAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FREL
DFAR
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
FREL
DFAR
Basic Materials
FREL
DFAR
-
Communication Services
FREL
DFAR
-
Technology
FREL
DFAR
-
Energy
FREL
DFAR
-
Financial Services
FREL
DFAR
Consumer Cyclical
FREL
-
DFAR
-
Consumer Defensive
FREL
-
DFAR
-
Healthcare
FREL
-
DFAR
-
Industrials
FREL
-
DFAR
-
Utilities
FREL
-
DFAR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FREL vs. DFAR — Risk / Return Rank
FREL
DFAR
FREL vs. DFAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) and Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FREL | DFAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.16 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.36 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.67 | 4.29 | -0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FREL | DFAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 0.88 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.15 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
FREL vs. DFAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FREL drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, which is greater than DFAR's maximum drawdown of -32.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FREL and DFAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FREL | DFAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.61% | -32.27% | -10.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.45% | -8.43% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.54% | -17.64% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.93% | -3.01% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.95% | -14.22% | +4.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 2.67% | +0.01% |
Volatility
FREL vs. DFAR - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) and Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) have volatilities of 3.75% and 3.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FREL | DFAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 3.71% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 9.40% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 13.10% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 19.13% | -0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.67% | 19.13% | +1.54% |
FREL vs. DFAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FREL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAR's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FREL vs. DFAR - Dividend Comparison
FREL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than DFAR's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF | 2.77% | 2.97% | 2.89% | 3.06% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FREL Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF | 3.34% | 3.59% | 3.48% | 3.73% | 3.57% | 2.34% | 3.77% | 3.32% | 5.54% | 3.27% | 4.01% | 3.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, FREL and DFAR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FREL has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to DFAR (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FREL dropped -42.61% vs DFAR's -32.27%.
On 3-year performance, DFAR leads with 9.64% vs 9.05% for FREL. On fees, FREL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFAR has performed better with a 9.64% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FREL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for DFAR.
FREL has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 2.77% for DFAR.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FREL and 0.19% for DFAR.
DFAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FREL and DFAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer