PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FREL vs. DFAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FREL vs. DFAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) and Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FREL achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than DFAR's 11.46% return.


FREL

1D
-0.14%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
7.59%
6M
6.51%
1Y
9.81%
3Y*
9.05%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*
5.67%

DFAR

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
11.46%
6M
10.41%
1Y
11.45%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FREL vs. DFAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FREL
Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF
7.59%3.09%5.05%11.74%-15.78%
DFAR
Dimensional US Real Estate ETF
11.46%1.31%5.25%11.04%-14.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FREL and DFAR is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.99

The correlation between FREL and DFAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

FREL vs. DFAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FREL
DFAR

Real Estate

97.6%
99.8%

Basic Materials

1.2%

-

Communication Services

0.4%

-

Technology

0.3%

-

Energy

0.1%

-

Financial Services

0.0%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

FREL
97.6%
DFAR
99.8%

Basic Materials

FREL
1.2%
DFAR

-

Communication Services

FREL
0.4%
DFAR

-

Technology

FREL
0.3%
DFAR

-

Energy

FREL
0.1%
DFAR

-

Financial Services

FREL
0.0%
DFAR
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FREL

-

DFAR

-

Consumer Defensive

FREL

-

DFAR

-

Healthcare

FREL

-

DFAR

-

Industrials

FREL

-

DFAR

-

Utilities

FREL

-

DFAR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FREL vs. DFAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FREL
FREL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FREL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FREL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FREL Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FREL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FREL Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAR
DFAR Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
DFAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAR Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAR Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FREL vs. DFAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) and Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRELDFARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.16

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

1.36

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.67

4.29

-0.62

FREL vs. DFAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FREL Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the DFAR Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FREL and DFAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRELDFARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

0.88

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.15

+0.10

Drawdowns

FREL vs. DFAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FREL drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, which is greater than DFAR's maximum drawdown of -32.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FREL and DFAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRELDFARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.61%

-32.27%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

-8.43%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

-17.64%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.93%

-3.01%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.95%

-14.22%

+4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.67%

+0.01%

Volatility

FREL vs. DFAR - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) and Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) have volatilities of 3.75% and 3.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRELDFARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

3.71%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.27%

9.40%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.17%

13.10%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.84%

19.13%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.67%

19.13%

+1.54%

FREL vs. DFAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FREL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAR's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FREL vs. DFAR - Dividend Comparison

FREL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than DFAR's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAR
Dimensional US Real Estate ETF
2.77%2.97%2.89%3.06%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FREL
Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF
3.34%3.59%3.48%3.73%3.57%2.34%3.77%3.32%5.54%3.27%4.01%3.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FREL and DFAR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FREL has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to DFAR (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FREL dropped -42.61% vs DFAR's -32.27%.

On 3-year performance, DFAR leads with 9.64% vs 9.05% for FREL. On fees, FREL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFAR has performed better with a 9.64% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FREL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for DFAR.

FREL has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 2.77% for DFAR.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FREL and 0.19% for DFAR.

DFAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FREL and DFAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer