FRDPX vs. TZINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) and Templeton Global Balanced Fund (TZINX).
FRDPX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jan 14, 1987. TZINX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 30, 2005.
Performance
FRDPX vs. TZINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRDPX vs. TZINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRDPX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund | -2.58% | 11.96% | 10.92% | 12.10% | -10.69% | 26.62% | 16.29% | 29.83% | -5.27% | 17.33% |
TZINX Templeton Global Balanced Fund | 1.25% | 27.85% | 0.73% | 14.45% | -14.31% | -1.44% | 1.70% | 7.58% | -9.18% | 12.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRDPX achieves a -2.58% return, which is significantly lower than TZINX's 1.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FRDPX has outperformed TZINX with an annualized return of 10.76%, while TZINX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.38% annualized return.
FRDPX
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -5.11%
- YTD
- -2.58%
- 6M
- -1.99%
- 1Y
- 10.60%
- 3Y*
- 9.38%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
TZINX
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 5.95%
- 1Y
- 22.29%
- 3Y*
- 12.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 4.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRDPX vs. TZINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRDPX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than TZINX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRDPX vs. TZINX — Risk / Return Rank
FRDPX
TZINX
FRDPX vs. TZINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) and Templeton Global Balanced Fund (TZINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRDPX | TZINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.70 | 1.98 | -1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 2.64 | -1.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.38 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 2.70 | -1.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.15 | 10.55 | -5.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRDPX | TZINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 1.98 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.34 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.39 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.45 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRDPX and TZINX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FRDPX vs. TZINX - Dividend Comparison
FRDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, more than TZINX's 4.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRDPX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund | 10.52% | 10.25% | 10.15% | 4.60% | 4.96% | 4.42% | 0.82% | 3.01% | 5.20% | 0.90% | 3.09% | 5.30% |
TZINX Templeton Global Balanced Fund | 4.94% | 4.00% | 5.43% | 3.68% | 3.47% | 2.24% | 2.12% | 4.43% | 4.55% | 2.82% | 1.12% | 7.19% |
Drawdowns
FRDPX vs. TZINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRDPX drawdown since its inception was -51.57%, which is greater than TZINX's maximum drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDPX and TZINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRDPX | TZINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.57% | -36.06% | -15.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.54% | -8.42% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.07% | -29.60% | +8.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.89% | -29.60% | -5.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.15% | -6.84% | +1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -7.52% | +1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 2.16% | +0.13% |
Volatility
FRDPX vs. TZINX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) is 4.22%, while Templeton Global Balanced Fund (TZINX) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that FRDPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TZINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRDPX | TZINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 5.04% | -0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.78% | 7.91% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 11.58% | +3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 11.82% | +3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 11.33% | +5.84% |