PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRDPX vs. NWAUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FRDPX vs. NWAUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FRDPX vs. NWAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FRDPX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund
-4.58%11.96%10.92%12.10%-10.69%25.83%
NWAUX
Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund
9.70%-4.92%27.90%18.30%-3.23%22.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRDPX achieves a -4.58% return, which is significantly lower than NWAUX's 9.70% return.


FRDPX

1D
-0.05%
1M
-7.10%
YTD
-4.58%
6M
-3.87%
1Y
8.41%
3Y*
8.63%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
10.53%

NWAUX

1D
0.74%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
9.70%
6M
7.83%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
12.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FRDPX vs. NWAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRDPX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NWAUX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FRDPX vs. NWAUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRDPX
FRDPX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FRDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

NWAUX
NWAUX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
NWAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
NWAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRDPX vs. NWAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRDPXNWAUXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.63

0.49

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.03

0.73

+0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.10

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

0.58

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.45

1.36

+2.08

FRDPX vs. NWAUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRDPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is comparable to the NWAUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRDPX and NWAUX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRDPXNWAUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

0.49

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.79

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.83

-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between FRDPX and NWAUX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FRDPX vs. NWAUX - Dividend Comparison

FRDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.74%, more than NWAUX's 4.69% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRDPX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund
10.74%10.25%10.15%4.60%4.96%4.42%0.82%3.01%5.20%0.90%3.09%5.30%
NWAUX
Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund
4.69%4.35%13.58%0.40%1.93%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FRDPX vs. NWAUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRDPX drawdown since its inception was -51.57%, which is greater than NWAUX's maximum drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDPX and NWAUX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FRDPXNWAUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.57%

-21.07%

-30.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.54%

-8.87%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.07%

-21.07%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.10%

-7.03%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-6.85%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

3.83%

-1.57%

Volatility

FRDPX vs. NWAUX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX) at 2.74%. This indicates that FRDPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FRDPXNWAUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

2.74%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.49%

7.29%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.22%

12.58%

+2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

16.10%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

16.05%

+1.11%