PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRBSX vs. SBLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRBSX vs. SBLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund (FRBSX) and ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRBSX achieves a 7.51% return, which is significantly higher than SBLGX's 4.27% return. Over the past 10 years, FRBSX has underperformed SBLGX with an annualized return of 8.57%, while SBLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.37% annualized return.


FRBSX

1D
0.16%
1M
1.55%
YTD
7.51%
6M
7.93%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
11.82%
5Y*
5.33%
10Y*
8.57%

SBLGX

1D
-1.54%
1M
4.43%
YTD
4.27%
6M
3.64%
1Y
10.99%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*
14.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRBSX vs. SBLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRBSX
Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund
7.51%6.57%10.78%9.00%-6.81%26.62%-2.40%24.53%-12.64%12.50%
SBLGX
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund
4.27%8.44%27.60%45.00%-32.96%21.71%30.84%31.69%-0.44%25.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FRBSX and SBLGX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between FRBSX and SBLGX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRBSX vs. SBLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRBSX
FRBSX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FRBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FRBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

SBLGX
SBLGX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SBLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SBLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRBSX vs. SBLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund (FRBSX) and ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRBSXSBLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.14

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

0.69

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.87

2.10

+1.77

FRBSX vs. SBLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRBSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the SBLGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRBSX and SBLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRBSXSBLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

0.77

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.47

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.70

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.48

+0.15

Drawdowns

FRBSX vs. SBLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRBSX drawdown since its inception was -63.47%, which is greater than SBLGX's maximum drawdown of -53.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRBSX and SBLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRBSXSBLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.47%

-53.64%

-9.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.15%

-16.95%

+6.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

-20.98%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

-38.28%

+16.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.69%

-38.28%

-5.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-2.13%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-12.91%

+4.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

5.53%

-2.01%

Volatility

FRBSX vs. SBLGX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund (FRBSX) and ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX) have volatilities of 4.00% and 4.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRBSXSBLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

4.02%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.79%

11.63%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.21%

15.18%

-1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.31%

21.16%

-3.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

20.45%

-1.13%

FRBSX vs. SBLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRBSX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than SBLGX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRBSX vs. SBLGX - Dividend Comparison

FRBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than SBLGX's 12.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRBSX
Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund
4.28%4.60%8.44%2.32%4.39%13.02%3.71%7.88%16.87%8.07%6.60%17.29%
SBLGX
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund
12.16%12.68%5.39%12.39%9.34%12.48%6.17%5.12%4.00%4.41%2.08%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRBSX and SBLGX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBLGX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to FRBSX (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRBSX dropped -63.47% vs SBLGX's -53.64%.

FRBSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRBSX and SBLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer