PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRASX vs. PADLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRASX vs. PADLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund (FRASX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FRASX having a 4.58% return and PADLX slightly higher at 4.79%.


FRASX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.53%
YTD
4.58%
6M
4.99%
1Y
11.67%
3Y*
8.65%
5Y*
3.29%
10Y*
5.66%

PADLX

1D
0.26%
1M
0.85%
YTD
4.79%
6M
5.33%
1Y
13.66%
3Y*
10.39%
5Y*
4.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRASX vs. PADLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FRASX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund
4.58%11.05%5.18%9.62%-13.50%5.33%10.38%
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.79%10.83%8.34%11.01%-12.54%2.93%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FRASX and PADLX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.92

The correlation between FRASX and PADLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRASX vs. PADLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRASX
FRASX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FRASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRASX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FRASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRASX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

PADLX
PADLX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PADLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PADLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PADLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PADLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PADLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRASX vs. PADLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund (FRASX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRASXPADLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.59

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.72

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.45

16.26

-3.81

FRASX vs. PADLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRASX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the PADLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRASX and PADLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRASXPADLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.97

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.60

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.65

-0.12

Drawdowns

FRASX vs. PADLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRASX drawdown since its inception was -40.08%, which is greater than PADLX's maximum drawdown of -18.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRASX and PADLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRASXPADLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.08%

-18.87%

-21.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.92%

-3.63%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.86%

-6.63%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.55%

-18.87%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.09%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-4.83%

-0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.83%

+0.08%

Volatility

FRASX vs. PADLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund (FRASX) has a higher volatility of 1.86% compared to Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX) at 1.51%. This indicates that FRASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRASXPADLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.86%

1.51%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.96%

3.64%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.82%

4.56%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.37%

6.65%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.35%

7.51%

-1.16%

FRASX vs. PADLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRASX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than PADLX's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRASX vs. PADLX - Dividend Comparison

FRASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than PADLX's 4.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRASX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund
2.71%2.51%2.88%2.67%4.93%5.21%3.38%3.23%6.32%24.29%2.17%4.48%
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.94%5.03%3.71%2.91%1.01%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FRASX and PADLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRASX has higher volatility (1.86%) compared to PADLX (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRASX dropped -40.08% vs PADLX's -18.87%.

PADLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRASX and PADLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer