PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRASX vs. FIRVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRASX vs. FIRVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund (FRASX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRASX achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly lower than FIRVX's 1,440,933.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FRASX has underperformed FIRVX with an annualized return of 5.73%, while FIRVX has yielded a comparatively higher 176.04% annualized return.


FRASX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.72%
YTD
4.26%
6M
4.38%
1Y
10.96%
3Y*
8.18%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*
5.73%

FIRVX

1D
1,371,718.18%
1M
1,382,668.54%
YTD
1,440,933.92%
6M
1,442,468.36%
1Y
1,545,588.89%
3Y*
2,512.79%
5Y*
597.67%
10Y*
176.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRASX vs. FIRVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRASX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund
4.26%11.05%5.18%9.62%-13.50%5.33%10.89%14.42%-3.67%12.07%
FIRVX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund
1,440,933.92%12.25%5.86%10.72%-14.63%6.77%12.06%16.19%-4.45%13.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FRASX and FIRVX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2007

1.00

The correlation between FRASX and FIRVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRASX vs. FIRVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRASX
FRASX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FRASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRASX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FRASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRASX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FIRVX
FIRVX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FIRVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIRVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIRVX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FIRVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIRVX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRASX vs. FIRVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund (FRASX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRASXFIRVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-351,352.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

49,085.82

-49,084.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

356,370.91

-356,368.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.74

1,512,145.77

-1,512,134.03

FRASX vs. FIRVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRASX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the FIRVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRASX and FIRVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRASX vs. FIRVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRASX drawdown since its inception was -40.08%, roughly equal to the maximum FIRVX drawdown of -40.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRASX and FIRVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRASXFIRVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.08%

-40.59%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.92%

-4.51%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.86%

-6.52%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.55%

-20.10%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.55%

-20.10%

+1.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

0.00%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-4.97%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

1.06%

-0.13%

Volatility

FRASX vs. FIRVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund (FRASX) is 2.05%, while Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund (FIRVX) has a volatility of 952.63%. This indicates that FRASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIRVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRASXFIRVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

952.63%

-950.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.28%

952.62%

-948.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.05%

1,374,447.92%

-1,374,442.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.41%

614,671.81%

-614,665.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.36%

434,465.54%

-434,459.18%

FRASX vs. FIRVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRASX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than FIRVX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRASX vs. FIRVX - Dividend Comparison

FRASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than FIRVX's 102.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIRVX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2020 Fund
102.87%2.83%2.74%2.57%3.52%4.61%3.74%3.18%6.90%25.16%2.28%4.45%
FRASX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2015 Fund
3.04%2.51%2.88%2.67%4.93%5.21%3.38%3.23%6.32%24.29%2.17%4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FRASX and FIRVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIRVX has higher volatility (952.63%) compared to FRASX (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRASX dropped -40.08% vs FIRVX's -40.59%.

FRASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRASX and FIRVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer