Correlation
The correlation between FRAF and MTB is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
FRAF vs. MTB
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) and M&T Bank Corporation (MTB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FRAF or MTB.
Performance
FRAF vs. MTB - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
FRAF:
2.12
MTB:
0.92
FRAF:
3.39
MTB:
1.44
FRAF:
1.48
MTB:
1.19
FRAF:
2.22
MTB:
0.93
FRAF:
9.12
MTB:
2.20
FRAF:
5.77%
MTB:
12.03%
FRAF:
25.22%
MTB:
29.87%
FRAF:
-44.48%
MTB:
-73.50%
FRAF:
-2.76%
MTB:
-16.62%
Fundamentals
FRAF:
$171.64M
MTB:
$29.37B
FRAF:
$2.61
MTB:
$15.06
FRAF:
14.71
MTB:
12.15
FRAF:
0.00
MTB:
28.64
FRAF:
2.41
MTB:
3.34
FRAF:
1.14
MTB:
1.10
FRAF:
$94.95M
MTB:
$13.28B
FRAF:
$75.04M
MTB:
$8.76B
FRAF:
$6.24M
MTB:
$3.92B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRAF achieves a 30.67% return, which is significantly higher than MTB's -2.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FRAF has outperformed MTB with an annualized return of 8.36%, while MTB has yielded a comparatively lower 7.08% annualized return.
FRAF
30.67%
0.34%
15.87%
52.98%
12.42%
13.52%
8.36%
MTB
-2.17%
7.59%
-15.87%
27.29%
3.65%
15.09%
7.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FRAF vs. MTB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FRAF
MTB
FRAF vs. MTB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) and M&T Bank Corporation (MTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
FRAF vs. MTB - Dividend Comparison
FRAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than MTB's 2.96% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRAF Franklin Financial Services Corporation | 3.36% | 4.28% | 4.06% | 3.55% | 3.78% | 4.44% | 3.02% | 3.33% | 2.41% | 2.87% | 3.15% | 3.09% |
MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 2.96% | 2.85% | 3.79% | 3.31% | 2.93% | 3.46% | 2.42% | 2.48% | 1.75% | 1.79% | 2.31% | 2.23% |
Drawdowns
FRAF vs. MTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRAF drawdown since its inception was -44.48%, smaller than the maximum MTB drawdown of -73.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRAF and MTB.
Loading data...
Volatility
FRAF vs. MTB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) is 1.81%, while M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that FRAF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
FRAF vs. MTB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Franklin Financial Services Corporation and M&T Bank Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities