FRAF vs. MTB
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) and M&T Bank Corporation (MTB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FRAF or MTB.
Correlation
The correlation between FRAF and MTB is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FRAF vs. MTB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FRAF:
1.99
MTB:
1.88
FRAF:
3.24
MTB:
2.86
FRAF:
1.45
MTB:
1.34
FRAF:
2.01
MTB:
1.95
FRAF:
7.43
MTB:
8.44
FRAF:
6.78%
MTB:
5.86%
FRAF:
25.36%
MTB:
26.31%
FRAF:
-44.48%
MTB:
-73.50%
FRAF:
0.00%
MTB:
-9.68%
Fundamentals
FRAF:
$168.09M
MTB:
$33.06B
FRAF:
$2.51
MTB:
$14.64
FRAF:
15.13
MTB:
13.61
FRAF:
0.00
MTB:
1.37
FRAF:
$76.32M
MTB:
$9.03B
FRAF:
$87.99M
MTB:
$9.03B
FRAF:
$5.95M
MTB:
$2.77B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRAF achieves a 28.10% return, which is significantly higher than MTB's 5.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FRAF has outperformed MTB with an annualized return of 9.53%, while MTB has yielded a comparatively lower 8.05% annualized return.
FRAF
28.10%
14.68%
29.37%
50.08%
4.93%
9.53%
MTB
5.97%
1.26%
24.03%
49.81%
6.92%
8.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FRAF vs. MTB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FRAF
MTB
FRAF vs. MTB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) and M&T Bank Corporation (MTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FRAF vs. MTB - Dividend Comparison
FRAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than MTB's 2.69% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRAF Franklin Financial Services Corporation | 3.37% | 4.28% | 4.06% | 3.55% | 3.78% | 4.44% | 3.02% | 3.33% | 2.41% | 2.87% | 3.15% | 3.09% |
MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 2.69% | 2.85% | 3.79% | 3.31% | 2.93% | 3.46% | 2.42% | 2.48% | 1.75% | 1.79% | 2.31% | 2.23% |
Drawdowns
FRAF vs. MTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRAF drawdown since its inception was -44.48%, smaller than the maximum MTB drawdown of -73.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRAF and MTB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FRAF vs. MTB - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) at 4.95%. This indicates that FRAF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FRAF vs. MTB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Franklin Financial Services Corporation and M&T Bank Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities