FQTIX vs. PIAMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FQTIX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I) and PIAMX (PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FQTIX returned 3.80%/yr vs 4.14%/yr for PIAMX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FQTIX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for PIAMX.

Performance

FQTIX vs. PIAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) and PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQTIX achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly higher than PIAMX's 0.79% return.

FQTIX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 3.55%
• 6M: 4.18%
• 1Y: 9.55%
• 3Y*: 8.69%
• 5Y*: 3.80%
• 10Y*: —

PIAMX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 0.79%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: 7.53%
• 5Y*: 4.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQTIX vs. PIAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I	3.55%	7.51%	8.03%	13.44%	-14.39%	8.51%	3.68%	4.11%
PIAMX PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund	0.79%	2.34%	11.23%	16.38%	-10.93%	7.82%	9.05%	4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FQTIX and PIAMX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019	0.68

The correlation between FQTIX and PIAMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FQTIX vs. PIAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQTIX

FQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

PIAMX

PIAMX Risk / Return Rank: 18
PIAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
PIAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
PIAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
PIAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
PIAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQTIX vs. PIAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) and PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FQTIX	PIAMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.16	1.35	+1.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.79	1.84	+2.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.72	1.27	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.44	1.12	+3.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.37	3.37	+20.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FQTIX vs. PIAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQTIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the PIAMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQTIX and PIAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FQTIX	PIAMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.16	1.35	+1.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	1.03	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	1.22	-0.63

Drawdowns

FQTIX vs. PIAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQTIX drawdown since its inception was -24.62%, which is greater than PIAMX's maximum drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQTIX and PIAMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FQTIX	PIAMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.62%	-18.15%	-6.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.20%	-3.75%	+1.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.42%	-6.17%	-0.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.81%	-13.92%	-4.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.55%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.32%	-2.34%	-1.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.42%	1.25%	-0.83%

Volatility

FQTIX vs. PIAMX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX) at 0.73%. This indicates that FQTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FQTIX	PIAMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.81%	0.73%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.37%	2.44%	-0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.09%	3.12%	-0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.94%	4.04%	+1.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.72%	4.23%	+3.49%

FQTIX vs. PIAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQTIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PIAMX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FQTIX vs. PIAMX - Dividend Comparison

FQTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%, less than PIAMX's 7.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I	6.84%	5.70%	7.86%	7.64%	8.10%	7.15%	6.89%	5.63%	0.00%
PIAMX PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund	7.90%	9.12%	8.49%	8.12%	7.99%	8.64%	6.63%	6.96%	7.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FQTIX and PIAMX in my portfolio?

FQTIX and PIAMX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FQTIX or PIAMX?

FQTIX has higher volatility (0.81%) compared to PIAMX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQTIX dropped -24.62% vs PIAMX's -18.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.