FQTIX vs. FKGRX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FQTIX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I) and FKGRX (Franklin Growth Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - FQTIX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while FKGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 5 years, FQTIX returned 3.53%/yr vs 7.53%/yr for FKGRX. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FQTIX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for FKGRX.

Performance

FQTIX vs. FKGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) and Franklin Growth Fund Class A (FKGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQTIX achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than FKGRX's 4.81% return.

FQTIX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -0.78%
• 6M: 1.81%
• YTD: 3.15%
• 1Y: 7.49%
• 3Y*: 7.86%
• 5Y*: 3.53%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.42%

FKGRX

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: -0.91%
• 6M: 3.50%
• YTD: 4.81%
• 1Y: 11.92%
• 3Y*: 14.41%
• 5Y*: 7.53%
• 10Y*: 13.46%
• ALL TIME*: 11.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FKGRX Franklin Growth Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FQTIX vs. FKGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I	3.15%	7.51%	8.03%	13.44%	-14.39%	8.51%	3.68%	4.11%
FKGRX Franklin Growth Fund Class A	4.81%	15.38%	17.96%	27.54%	-25.32%	21.61%	30.71%	16.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FQTIX and FKGRX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019	0.46

The correlation between FQTIX and FKGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FQTIX vs. FKGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FQTIX

FQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 92
FQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

FKGRX

FKGRX Risk / Return Rank: 20
FKGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FKGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FKGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FKGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FKGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FQTIX vs. FKGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) and Franklin Growth Fund Class A (FKGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FQTIX	FKGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	0.71	+1.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	1.06	+2.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.13	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.37	0.86	+2.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.44	3.32	+13.13

FQTIX vs. FKGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQTIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the FKGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQTIX and FKGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FQTIX vs. FKGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQTIX drawdown since its inception was -24.62%, smaller than the maximum FKGRX drawdown of -51.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQTIX and FKGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FQTIX	FKGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.62%	-51.08%	+26.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.20%	-11.48%	+9.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.59%	-21.72%	+16.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.81%	-32.22%	+13.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	-2.41%	+1.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.23%	-6.72%	+2.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.45%	2.96%	-2.51%

Volatility

FQTIX vs. FKGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) is 0.60%, while Franklin Growth Fund Class A (FKGRX) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that FQTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FQTIX	FKGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.60%	3.41%	-2.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.41%	10.82%	-8.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.09%	13.89%	-10.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.94%	19.69%	-13.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.64%	19.54%	-11.90%

FQTIX vs. FKGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQTIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FKGRX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

FQTIX vs. FKGRX - Dividend Comparison

FQTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, less than FKGRX's 13.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FKGRX Franklin Growth Fund Class A	13.71%	14.37%	8.34%	6.26%	10.49%	9.19%	7.97%	5.75%	1.65%	2.38%	3.26%	3.88%
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I	7.05%	5.70%	7.86%	7.64%	8.10%	7.15%	6.89%	5.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FQTIX and FKGRX in my portfolio?

FQTIX and FKGRX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FQTIX or FKGRX?

FKGRX has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to FQTIX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQTIX dropped -24.62% vs FKGRX's -51.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.