FQTIX vs. FHYSX
FQTIX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I) and FHYSX (Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FQTIX returned 3.53%/yr vs 3.07%/yr for FHYSX. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FQTIX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FHYSX.
Performance
FQTIX vs. FHYSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FQTIX achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly higher than FHYSX's 0.96% return.
FQTIX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 3.15%
- 1Y
- 7.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.86%
- 5Y*
- 3.53%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.42%
FHYSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- 7.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- 4.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FQTIX vs. FHYSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I | 3.15% | 7.51% | 8.03% | 13.44% | -14.39% | 8.51% | 3.68% | 4.11% |
FHYSX Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio | 0.96% | 9.14% | 6.42% | 12.77% | -13.16% | 4.49% | 6.08% | 6.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between FQTIX and FHYSX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FQTIX and FHYSX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FQTIX vs. FHYSX — Risk / Return Rank
FQTIX
FHYSX
FQTIX vs. FHYSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) and Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FQTIX | FHYSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.35 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 2.12 | +1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.44 | 10.39 | +6.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FQTIX vs. FHYSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FQTIX drawdown since its inception was -24.62%, which is greater than FHYSX's maximum drawdown of -21.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQTIX and FHYSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FQTIX | FHYSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.62% | -21.45% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.20% | -2.44% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.59% | -3.64% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.81% | -16.93% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -0.93% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.23% | -2.56% | -1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.45% | 0.50% | -0.05% |
Volatility
FQTIX vs. FHYSX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) has a higher volatility of 0.60% compared to Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) at 0.53%. This indicates that FQTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHYSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FQTIX | FHYSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | 0.53% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.41% | 2.67% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.09% | 3.40% | -0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 5.24% | +0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.64% | 5.72% | +1.92% |
FQTIX vs. FHYSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FQTIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FHYSX's 0.02% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FQTIX vs. FHYSX - Dividend Comparison
FQTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, more than FHYSX's 5.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHYSX Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio | 5.84% | 6.28% | 5.84% | 5.30% | 5.27% | 4.54% | 5.74% | 6.18% | 6.61% | 6.98% | 6.45% | 8.45% |
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I | 7.05% | 5.70% | 7.86% | 7.64% | 8.10% | 7.15% | 6.89% | 5.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FQTIX and FHYSX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FQTIX has higher volatility (0.60%) compared to FHYSX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQTIX dropped -24.62% vs FHYSX's -21.45%.
FQTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FQTIX and FHYSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer