FQTIX vs. FAHYX
FQTIX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I) and FAHYX (Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class M) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FQTIX returned 3.69%/yr vs 6.21%/yr for FAHYX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FQTIX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for FAHYX.
Performance
FQTIX vs. FAHYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FQTIX achieves a 3.68% return, which is significantly lower than FAHYX's 7.76% return.
FQTIX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 3.68%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- 1Y
- 9.27%
- 3Y*
- 8.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- —
FAHYX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- YTD
- 7.76%
- 6M
- 7.99%
- 1Y
- 16.07%
- 3Y*
- 12.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 7.78%
FQTIX vs. FAHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I | 3.68% | 7.51% | 8.03% | 13.44% | -14.39% | 8.51% | 3.68% | 4.11% |
FAHYX Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class M | 7.76% | 11.75% | 9.24% | 12.04% | -11.37% | 10.74% | 8.70% | 7.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between FQTIX and FAHYX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019 | 0.66 |
The correlation between FQTIX and FAHYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FQTIX vs. FAHYX — Risk / Return Rank
FQTIX
FAHYX
FQTIX vs. FAHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) and Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class M (FAHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FQTIX | FAHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.55 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.38 | 5.28 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.00 | 21.54 | +1.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FQTIX vs. FAHYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FQTIX drawdown since its inception was -24.62%, smaller than the maximum FAHYX drawdown of -48.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQTIX and FAHYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FQTIX | FAHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.62% | -48.37% | +23.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.20% | -3.13% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.42% | -6.95% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.81% | -15.35% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | 0.00% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -4.50% | +0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.42% | 0.77% | -0.35% |
Volatility
FQTIX vs. FAHYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) is 0.82%, while Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class M (FAHYX) has a volatility of 2.38%. This indicates that FQTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FQTIX | FAHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.82% | 2.38% | -1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.44% | 4.77% | -2.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.13% | 5.86% | -2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 6.48% | -0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.70% | 7.68% | +0.02% |
FQTIX vs. FAHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FQTIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FAHYX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
FQTIX vs. FAHYX - Dividend Comparison
FQTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%, more than FAHYX's 4.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAHYX Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class M | 4.10% | 4.45% | 3.96% | 4.45% | 6.84% | 4.56% | 3.47% | 4.25% | 5.74% | 4.66% | 5.29% | 4.21% |
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I | 6.84% | 5.70% | 7.86% | 7.64% | 8.10% | 7.15% | 6.89% | 5.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FQTIX and FAHYX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAHYX has higher volatility (2.38%) compared to FQTIX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQTIX dropped -24.62% vs FAHYX's -48.37%.
FQTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FQTIX and FAHYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer