PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQTIX vs. CWFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FQTIX vs. CWFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) and Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQTIX achieves a 3.68% return, which is significantly higher than CWFIX's 1.61% return.


FQTIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.62%
YTD
3.68%
6M
3.92%
1Y
9.27%
3Y*
8.64%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*

CWFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.61%
6M
1.83%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
6.53%
5Y*
3.92%
10Y*
4.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQTIX vs. CWFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FQTIX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I
3.68%7.51%8.03%13.44%-14.39%8.51%3.68%4.11%
CWFIX
Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund
1.61%6.99%5.78%7.80%-3.17%2.40%4.38%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FQTIX and CWFIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019

0.72

The correlation between FQTIX and CWFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FQTIX vs. CWFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQTIX
FQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

CWFIX
CWFIX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CWFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CWFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQTIX vs. CWFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) and Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FQTIXCWFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.96

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.38

4.68

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.00

25.02

-2.02

FQTIX vs. CWFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQTIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.08, which is comparable to the CWFIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQTIX and CWFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FQTIX vs. CWFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQTIX drawdown since its inception was -24.62%, which is greater than CWFIX's maximum drawdown of -12.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQTIX and CWFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FQTIXCWFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.62%

-12.41%

-12.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.20%

-1.13%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.42%

-1.37%

-5.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.81%

-6.36%

-12.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.10%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-0.85%

-3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

0.21%

+0.21%

Volatility

FQTIX vs. CWFIX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) has a higher volatility of 0.82% compared to Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund (CWFIX) at 0.37%. This indicates that FQTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CWFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FQTIXCWFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

0.37%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.44%

1.21%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13%

1.51%

+1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.94%

2.77%

+3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.70%

3.09%

+4.61%

FQTIX vs. CWFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQTIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CWFIX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FQTIX vs. CWFIX - Dividend Comparison

FQTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%, more than CWFIX's 5.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWFIX
Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund
5.15%5.17%5.09%4.41%3.17%2.79%3.38%3.60%3.24%2.82%3.79%3.32%
FQTIX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I
6.84%5.70%7.86%7.64%8.10%7.15%6.89%5.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FQTIX and CWFIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQTIX has higher volatility (0.82%) compared to CWFIX (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQTIX dropped -24.62% vs CWFIX's -12.41%.

CWFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 3.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FQTIX and CWFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer