FQLSX vs. FCNTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX).
FQLSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 8, 2017. FCNTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 17, 1967.
Performance
FQLSX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FQLSX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FQLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund | -3.48% | 22.80% | 18.08% | 21.04% | -18.58% | 16.89% | 18.43% | 25.96% | -8.31% | 10.12% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | -8.57% | 21.76% | 36.00% | 38.67% | -28.31% | 24.52% | 32.48% | 30.00% | -3.81% | 12.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FQLSX achieves a -3.48% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's -8.57% return.
FQLSX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- -3.48%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 18.53%
- 3Y*
- 16.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.89%
- 10Y*
- —
FCNTX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -9.40%
- YTD
- -8.57%
- 6M
- -6.17%
- 1Y
- 16.04%
- 3Y*
- 23.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 15.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FQLSX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FQLSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FQLSX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank
FQLSX
FCNTX
FQLSX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FQLSX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 0.83 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 1.30 | +0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.18 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 1.17 | +0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 4.57 | +1.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FQLSX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 0.83 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.67 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.76 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between FQLSX and FCNTX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FQLSX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison
FQLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than FCNTX's 5.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FQLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund | 3.44% | 3.32% | 7.20% | 2.08% | 5.79% | 8.05% | 5.76% | 7.02% | 8.18% | 3.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | 5.10% | 5.21% | 4.19% | 3.78% | 11.87% | 10.80% | 8.01% | 4.16% | 7.46% | 6.08% | 3.81% | 5.33% |
Drawdowns
FQLSX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FQLSX drawdown since its inception was -31.26%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQLSX and FCNTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FQLSX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.26% | -49.19% | +17.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.26% | -11.30% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.41% | -32.59% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.48% | -11.30% | +1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -8.18% | +2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 2.90% | -0.35% |
Volatility
FQLSX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) at 5.19%. This indicates that FQLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FQLSX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 5.19% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.38% | 10.56% | -1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.95% | 19.69% | -3.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 19.13% | -4.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 19.61% | -3.53% |