PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQIFX vs. PADLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FQIFX vs. PADLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class (FQIFX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQIFX achieves a 7.23% return, which is significantly higher than PADLX's 4.70% return.


FQIFX

1D
0.28%
1M
3.27%
YTD
7.23%
6M
7.55%
1Y
17.89%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
5.74%
10Y*
8.00%

PADLX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.57%
YTD
4.70%
6M
5.52%
1Y
13.99%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
4.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQIFX vs. PADLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FQIFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class
7.23%14.84%8.49%13.88%-16.54%9.52%12.88%
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.70%10.83%8.34%11.01%-12.54%2.93%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FQIFX and PADLX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.93

The correlation between FQIFX and PADLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FQIFX vs. PADLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQIFX
FQIFX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FQIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FQIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PADLX
PADLX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PADLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PADLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PADLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PADLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PADLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQIFX vs. PADLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class (FQIFX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FQIFXPADLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.47

3.10

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.53

4.61

-1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.62

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.87

-0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.31

16.98

-3.67

FQIFX vs. PADLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the PADLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQIFX and PADLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FQIFXPADLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

3.10

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.61

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.65

+0.08

Drawdowns

FQIFX vs. PADLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQIFX drawdown since its inception was -22.66%, which is greater than PADLX's maximum drawdown of -18.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQIFX and PADLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FQIFXPADLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.66%

-18.87%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.98%

-3.63%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.59%

-6.63%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.66%

-18.87%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.09%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-4.84%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

0.83%

+0.52%

Volatility

FQIFX vs. PADLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class (FQIFX) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX) at 1.57%. This indicates that FQIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FQIFXPADLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

1.57%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.97%

3.62%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.30%

4.55%

+2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.55%

6.65%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.90%

7.51%

+2.39%

FQIFX vs. PADLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQIFX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than PADLX's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FQIFX vs. PADLX - Dividend Comparison

FQIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, less than PADLX's 4.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FQIFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class
4.31%4.92%3.36%2.37%2.64%2.10%2.38%13.76%2.31%1.83%1.88%1.93%
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.95%5.03%3.71%2.91%1.01%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FQIFX and PADLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FQIFX has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to PADLX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQIFX dropped -22.66% vs PADLX's -18.87%.

PADLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FQIFX and PADLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer