PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQEMX vs. DESIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FQEMX vs. DESIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX) and DFA Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DESIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQEMX achieves a 90.31% return, which is significantly higher than DESIX's 21.43% return.


FQEMX

1D
5.50%
1M
34.47%
YTD
90.31%
6M
101.00%
1Y
169.89%
3Y*
48.77%
5Y*
10Y*

DESIX

1D
2.23%
1M
7.49%
YTD
21.43%
6M
23.14%
1Y
42.72%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQEMX vs. DESIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FQEMX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM
90.31%55.98%6.67%12.18%-20.68%0.32%
DESIX
DFA Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio
21.43%27.87%6.66%14.24%-18.07%20.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FQEMX and DESIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021

0.85

The correlation between FQEMX and DESIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FQEMX vs. DESIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQEMX
FQEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FQEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FQEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

DESIX
DESIX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DESIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DESIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DESIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DESIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DESIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQEMX vs. DESIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX) and DFA Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DESIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FQEMXDESIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.49

2.81

+3.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.22

3.73

+2.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.05

1.53

+0.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.31

3.35

+5.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

36.87

13.14

+23.73

FQEMX vs. DESIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQEMX Sharpe Ratio is 6.49, which is higher than the DESIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQEMX and DESIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FQEMXDESIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.49

2.81

+3.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.63

+0.58

Drawdowns

FQEMX vs. DESIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQEMX drawdown since its inception was -34.46%, roughly equal to the maximum DESIX drawdown of -36.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQEMX and DESIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FQEMXDESIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.46%

-36.03%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.93%

-12.70%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.93%

-16.82%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.79%

-7.74%

-3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.78%

3.24%

+1.54%

Volatility

FQEMX vs. DESIX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX) has a higher volatility of 13.30% compared to DFA Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DESIX) at 6.75%. This indicates that FQEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DESIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FQEMXDESIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.30%

6.75%

+6.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.45%

13.61%

+10.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.80%

15.80%

+12.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.10%

18.53%

+2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.10%

18.63%

+2.47%

FQEMX vs. DESIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQEMX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than DESIX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FQEMX vs. DESIX - Dividend Comparison

FQEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than DESIX's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DESIX
DFA Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio
2.17%2.63%2.79%2.85%2.51%22.49%1.38%1.99%1.21%
FQEMX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM
1.67%3.18%3.15%4.82%3.93%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FQEMX and DESIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQEMX has higher volatility (13.30%) compared to DESIX (6.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQEMX dropped -34.46% vs DESIX's -36.03%.

FQEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.49 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FQEMX and DESIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer