FQCHX vs. SRHMX
FQCHX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH) and SRHMX (Columbia High Yield Municipal Fund) are both High Yield Muni funds. Over the past 5 years, FQCHX returned 1.41%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for SRHMX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FQCHX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SRHMX.
Performance
FQCHX vs. SRHMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FQCHX achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly lower than SRHMX's 3.04% return.
FQCHX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 3.40%
- 1Y
- 8.08%
- 3Y*
- 6.48%
- 5Y*
- 1.41%
- 10Y*
- —
SRHMX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 3.66%
- 1Y
- 9.24%
- 3Y*
- 6.35%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
FQCHX vs. SRHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FQCHX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH | 2.42% | 4.96% | 8.85% | 4.90% | -13.94% | 6.00% | 4.25% | 4.13% |
SRHMX Columbia High Yield Municipal Fund | 3.04% | 4.36% | 7.72% | 6.63% | -17.44% | 6.57% | 3.75% | 3.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between FQCHX and SRHMX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FQCHX and SRHMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FQCHX vs. SRHMX — Risk / Return Rank
FQCHX
SRHMX
FQCHX vs. SRHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX) and Columbia High Yield Municipal Fund (SRHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FQCHX | SRHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.65 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 3.37 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.70 | 12.24 | -1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FQCHX | SRHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.64 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.14 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.04 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
FQCHX vs. SRHMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FQCHX drawdown since its inception was -21.05%, smaller than the maximum SRHMX drawdown of -26.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQCHX and SRHMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FQCHX | SRHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.05% | -26.04% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.64% | -2.72% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.54% | -8.81% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.05% | -22.59% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.62% | -3.00% | -2.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 0.75% | 0.00% |
Volatility
FQCHX vs. SRHMX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX) and Columbia High Yield Municipal Fund (SRHMX) have volatilities of 1.32% and 1.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FQCHX | SRHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 1.34% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.60% | 2.55% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47% | 3.50% | -0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.65% | 5.90% | -0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.57% | 5.62% | +0.95% |
FQCHX vs. SRHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FQCHX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SRHMX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FQCHX vs. SRHMX - Dividend Comparison
FQCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than SRHMX's 4.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FQCHX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH | 5.48% | 7.32% | 6.12% | 3.92% | 4.22% | 3.39% | 3.35% | 3.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRHMX Columbia High Yield Municipal Fund | 4.63% | 5.65% | 4.79% | 4.30% | 4.46% | 3.40% | 3.83% | 4.55% | 5.10% | 4.30% | 4.56% | 4.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FQCHX and SRHMX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRHMX has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to FQCHX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQCHX dropped -21.05% vs SRHMX's -26.04%.
SRHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FQCHX and SRHMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer