FQCHX vs. NMHIX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FQCHX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH) and NMHIX (Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund) are both High Yield Muni funds. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FQCHX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for NMHIX.

Performance

FQCHX vs. NMHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX) and Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FQCHX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.24%
• YTD: 2.66%
• 6M: 3.28%
• 1Y: 7.95%
• 3Y*: 6.32%
• 5Y*: 1.42%
• 10Y*: —

NMHIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQCHX vs. NMHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FQCHX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH	2.66%	4.96%	8.85%	4.90%	-13.94%	6.00%	4.25%	4.13%
NMHIX Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund	0.48%	3.56%	6.27%	4.34%	-14.26%	4.90%	4.04%	3.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FQCHX and NMHIX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019	0.82

The correlation between FQCHX and NMHIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FQCHX vs. NMHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQCHX

FQCHX Risk / Return Rank: 78
FQCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FQCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FQCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FQCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FQCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

NMHIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQCHX vs. NMHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX) and Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FQCHX	NMHIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.99	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.54	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FQCHX	NMHIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.58%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.75%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FQCHX	NMHIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.95%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.58%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.40%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.65%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.54%	—	—

FQCHX vs. NMHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQCHX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NMHIX's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

FQCHX vs. NMHIX - Dividend Comparison

FQCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, more than NMHIX's 4.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FQCHX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH	5.47%	7.32%	6.12%	3.92%	4.22%	3.39%	3.35%	3.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NMHIX Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund	4.16%	3.98%	3.81%	3.11%	2.43%	2.74%	2.90%	3.36%	3.64%	3.44%	4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FQCHX and NMHIX in my portfolio?

FQCHX and NMHIX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.