PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQCHX vs. EWHYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FQCHX vs. EWHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX) and Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund Class W (EWHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FQCHX vs. EWHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FQCHX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH
-0.39%4.96%8.85%4.90%-13.94%0.53%
EWHYX
Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund Class W
0.37%3.59%5.42%7.74%-11.72%0.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQCHX achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than EWHYX's 0.37% return.


FQCHX

1D
0.35%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
1.61%
1Y
3.08%
3Y*
5.16%
5Y*
1.43%
10Y*

EWHYX

1D
0.38%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
0.37%
6M
2.18%
1Y
3.60%
3Y*
4.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FQCHX vs. EWHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQCHX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than EWHYX's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FQCHX vs. EWHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQCHX
FQCHX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FQCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FQCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

EWHYX
EWHYX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
EWHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
EWHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQCHX vs. EWHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX) and Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund Class W (EWHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FQCHXEWHYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.60

0.61

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.86

0.84

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.16

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.71

+0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.45

1.85

+0.60

FQCHX vs. EWHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQCHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the EWHYX Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQCHX and EWHYX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FQCHXEWHYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

0.61

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.19

+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between FQCHX and EWHYX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FQCHX vs. EWHYX - Dividend Comparison

FQCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.57%, more than EWHYX's 4.73% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
FQCHX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH
5.57%7.32%6.12%3.92%4.22%3.39%3.35%3.17%
EWHYX
Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund Class W
4.73%5.06%4.92%3.97%4.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FQCHX vs. EWHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQCHX drawdown since its inception was -21.05%, which is greater than EWHYX's maximum drawdown of -16.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQCHX and EWHYX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FQCHXEWHYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.05%

-16.52%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.55%

-6.59%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-2.43%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-5.55%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.53%

-0.61%

Volatility

FQCHX vs. EWHYX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund Class W (EWHYX) at 1.21%. This indicates that FQCHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FQCHXEWHYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

1.21%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.16%

2.17%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.85%

6.62%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.61%

5.27%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.62%

5.27%

+1.35%