PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPR.TO vs. CSAV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPR.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Preferred Share ETF (FPR.TO) and CI High Interest Savings ETF (CSAV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPR.TO achieves a 8.01% return, which is significantly higher than CSAV.TO's 1.18% return.


FPR.TO

1D
0.04%
1M
1.60%
6M
7.39%
YTD
8.01%
1Y
14.42%
3Y*
17.20%
5Y*
7.41%
10Y*
7.38%
ALL TIME*
7.69%

CSAV.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.15%
6M
1.01%
YTD
1.18%
1Y
2.17%
3Y*
3.44%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$1.49MCA$1.26MCA$1.48M
CA$158.30CA$3.44KCA$11.10K

FPR.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FPR.TO
CI Preferred Share ETF
8.01%16.63%23.27%3.44%-13.72%21.25%7.57%5.21%
CSAV.TO
CI High Interest Savings ETF
1.18%2.54%4.43%5.04%2.29%0.55%0.92%1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FPR.TO and CSAV.TO is -0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2019

0.00

The correlation between FPR.TO and CSAV.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPR.TO vs. CSAV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FPR.TO
FPR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FPR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FPR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

CSAV.TO
CSAV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CSAV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSAV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSAV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CSAV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSAV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FPR.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Preferred Share ETF (FPR.TO) and CI High Interest Savings ETF (CSAV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FPR.TOCSAV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-16.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

4.54

-3.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.19

108.77

-103.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.72

301.45

-282.73

FPR.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is lower than the CSAV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 8.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPR.TO and CSAV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FPR.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPR.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, which is greater than CSAV.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPR.TO and CSAV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPR.TOCSAV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-0.02%

-36.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-0.02%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.34%

-0.02%

-7.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.31%

-0.02%

-20.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

0.00%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

0.00%

-4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

0.01%

+0.75%

Volatility

FPR.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Preferred Share ETF (FPR.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.62% compared to CI High Interest Savings ETF (CSAV.TO) at 0.07%. This indicates that FPR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSAV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPR.TOCSAV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

0.07%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.50%

0.18%

+4.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.18%

0.25%

+6.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.24%

0.28%

+7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.35%

0.27%

+10.08%

FPR.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPR.TO has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CSAV.TO's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPR.TO vs. CSAV.TO - Dividend Comparison

FPR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than CSAV.TO's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CSAV.TO
CI High Interest Savings ETF
2.16%2.53%4.40%4.90%2.15%0.57%0.89%1.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FPR.TO
CI Preferred Share ETF
3.96%4.57%5.01%6.00%4.59%3.79%4.42%4.52%4.49%4.06%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPR.TO and CSAV.TO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSAV.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSAV.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FPR.TO.

FPR.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock, while CSAV.TO is Money Market. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FPR.TO and 0.15% for CSAV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPR.TO and CSAV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer