PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPR.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPR.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Preferred Share ETF (FPR.TO) and CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPR.TO achieves a 8.01% return, which is significantly higher than BTCX-B.TO's -26.95% return.


FPR.TO

1D
0.04%
1M
1.60%
6M
7.39%
YTD
8.01%
1Y
14.42%
3Y*
17.20%
5Y*
7.41%
10Y*
7.38%
ALL TIME*
7.69%

BTCX-B.TO

1D
-2.81%
1M
-0.23%
6M
-17.61%
YTD
-26.95%
1Y
-44.02%
3Y*
30.49%
5Y*
11.20%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$935.28KCA$1.05MCA$1.72M
CA$158.30CA$3.44KCA$11.10K

FPR.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FPR.TO
CI Preferred Share ETF
8.01%16.63%23.27%3.44%-13.72%12.56%
BTCX-B.TO
CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units
-26.95%-11.32%139.01%149.40%-62.06%-18.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FPR.TO and BTCX-B.TO is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPR.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FPR.TO
FPR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FPR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FPR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCX-B.TO
BTCX-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FPR.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Preferred Share ETF (FPR.TO) and CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FPR.TOBTCX-B.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

0.83

+0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.19

-0.87

+6.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.72

-1.31

+20.03

FPR.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPR.TO and BTCX-B.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FPR.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPR.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum BTCX-B.TO drawdown of -75.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPR.TO and BTCX-B.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPR.TOBTCX-B.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-75.26%

+39.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-52.71%

+49.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.34%

-52.71%

+45.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.31%

-75.26%

+54.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-49.98%

+49.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-33.43%

+28.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

35.25%

-34.49%

Volatility

FPR.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Preferred Share ETF (FPR.TO) is 1.62%, while CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) has a volatility of 8.27%. This indicates that FPR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCX-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPR.TOBTCX-B.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

8.27%

-6.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.50%

33.34%

-28.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.18%

43.84%

-36.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.24%

52.26%

-44.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.35%

54.52%

-44.17%

FPR.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FPR.TO and BTCX-B.TO have an expense ratio of 0.80%.


Dividends

FPR.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Dividend Comparison

FPR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, while BTCX-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BTCX-B.TO
CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FPR.TO
CI Preferred Share ETF
3.96%4.57%5.01%6.00%4.59%3.79%4.42%4.52%4.49%4.06%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPR.TO and BTCX-B.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.80% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FPR.TO and BTCX-B.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.80% per year.

FPR.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock, while BTCX-B.TO is Cryptocurrency.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPR.TO and BTCX-B.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer