PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPGLX vs. PADLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPGLX vs. PADLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class Z6 (FPGLX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPGLX achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly higher than PADLX's 4.88% return.


FPGLX

1D
0.36%
1M
2.83%
YTD
7.60%
6M
8.32%
1Y
18.39%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*

PADLX

1D
0.17%
1M
2.20%
YTD
4.88%
6M
5.33%
1Y
13.98%
3Y*
10.43%
5Y*
4.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPGLX vs. PADLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FPGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class Z6
7.60%16.44%12.27%13.69%-16.47%10.08%13.64%
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.88%10.83%8.34%11.01%-12.54%2.93%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FPGLX and PADLX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.90

The correlation between FPGLX and PADLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPGLX vs. PADLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPGLX
FPGLX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FPGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FPGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

PADLX
PADLX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PADLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PADLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PADLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PADLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PADLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPGLX vs. PADLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class Z6 (FPGLX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPGLXPADLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.63

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

3.92

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.56

17.17

-4.60

FPGLX vs. PADLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPGLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the PADLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPGLX and PADLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPGLXPADLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

3.14

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.62

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.65

+0.13

Drawdowns

FPGLX vs. PADLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPGLX drawdown since its inception was -23.49%, which is greater than PADLX's maximum drawdown of -18.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPGLX and PADLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPGLXPADLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.49%

-18.87%

-4.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.41%

-3.63%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.64%

-6.63%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.49%

-18.87%

-4.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-4.83%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

0.83%

+0.65%

Volatility

FPGLX vs. PADLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class Z6 (FPGLX) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX) at 1.57%. This indicates that FPGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPGLXPADLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

1.57%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.64%

3.62%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.96%

4.54%

+3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.04%

6.65%

+3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.50%

7.51%

+2.99%

FPGLX vs. PADLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPGLX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than PADLX's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPGLX vs. PADLX - Dividend Comparison

FPGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.20%, more than PADLX's 4.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2025 Fund Class Z6
8.20%8.20%7.99%2.43%9.35%9.53%6.46%6.91%10.08%2.56%
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.94%5.03%3.71%2.91%1.01%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FPGLX and PADLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FPGLX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to PADLX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPGLX dropped -23.49% vs PADLX's -18.87%.

PADLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPGLX and PADLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer