FPF vs. PISHX
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred and Income Fund (FPF) and Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares (PISHX).
FPF is managed by First Trust. It was launched on Apr 1, 2009. PISHX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Feb 28, 2019.
Performance
FPF vs. PISHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FPF vs. PISHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPF First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred and Income Fund | -4.04% | 13.14% | 20.90% | 5.31% | -25.83% | 9.12% | 9.67% | 16.93% |
PISHX Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares | -1.14% | 9.65% | 12.50% | 7.91% | -11.73% | 4.30% | 8.57% | 12.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPF achieves a -4.04% return, which is significantly lower than PISHX's -1.14% return.
FPF
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- -7.17%
- YTD
- -4.04%
- 6M
- -3.83%
- 1Y
- 4.72%
- 3Y*
- 13.45%
- 5Y*
- 1.98%
- 10Y*
- 5.68%
PISHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- -1.14%
- 6M
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- 6.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.90%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FPF vs. PISHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPF has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is higher than PISHX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FPF vs. PISHX — Risk / Return Rank
FPF
PISHX
FPF vs. PISHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred and Income Fund (FPF) and Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares (PISHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FPF | PISHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 2.13 | -1.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.56 | 2.66 | -2.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.54 | -0.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 1.93 | -1.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.35 | 8.68 | -7.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FPF | PISHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 2.13 | -1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.89 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.77 | -0.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between FPF and PISHX is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FPF vs. PISHX - Dividend Comparison
FPF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than PISHX's 5.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPF First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred and Income Fund | 9.36% | 8.85% | 9.17% | 8.31% | 8.62% | 6.75% | 6.55% | 7.08% | 8.79% | 7.63% | 9.31% | 9.16% |
PISHX Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares | 5.12% | 5.52% | 5.89% | 5.92% | 5.45% | 4.25% | 4.59% | 3.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FPF vs. PISHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPF drawdown since its inception was -53.78%, which is greater than PISHX's maximum drawdown of -27.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPF and PISHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPF | PISHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.78% | -27.12% | -26.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.17% | -3.46% | -6.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.06% | -19.14% | -17.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.99% | -2.83% | -5.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.49% | -4.03% | -4.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 0.77% | +2.56% |
Volatility
FPF vs. PISHX - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred and Income Fund (FPF) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares (PISHX) at 1.22%. This indicates that FPF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PISHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FPF | PISHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | 1.22% | +3.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.68% | 1.76% | +4.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.01% | 3.22% | +8.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.55% | 4.54% | +10.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.00% | 7.43% | +17.57% |