PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPBFX vs. TWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPBFX vs. TWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) and The Taiwan Fund Inc. (TWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPBFX achieves a 33.43% return, which is significantly lower than TWN's 89.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FPBFX has underperformed TWN with an annualized return of 13.58%, while TWN has yielded a comparatively higher 30.11% annualized return.


FPBFX

1D
2.19%
1M
7.75%
YTD
33.43%
6M
34.61%
1Y
61.36%
3Y*
25.97%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
13.58%

TWN

1D
0.19%
1M
7.55%
YTD
89.25%
6M
91.94%
1Y
163.62%
3Y*
62.85%
5Y*
33.66%
10Y*
30.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPBFX vs. TWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPBFX
Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund
33.43%37.15%9.26%14.07%-23.71%2.28%32.92%32.21%-18.08%40.06%
TWN
The Taiwan Fund Inc.
89.25%54.11%32.76%51.73%-38.54%58.14%40.71%47.00%-19.15%33.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FPBFX and TWN is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1989

0.45

The correlation between FPBFX and TWN shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.62 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPBFX vs. TWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPBFX
FPBFX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FPBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FPBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

TWN
TWN Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWN Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWN Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPBFX vs. TWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) and The Taiwan Fund Inc. (TWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FPBFXTWNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.85

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.87

17.73

-12.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.98

54.13

-36.15

FPBFX vs. TWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is lower than the TWN Sharpe Ratio of 5.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPBFX and TWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FPBFX vs. TWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPBFX drawdown since its inception was -69.06%, smaller than the maximum TWN drawdown of -79.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPBFX and TWN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPBFXTWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.06%

-79.52%

+10.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.25%

-9.29%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.48%

-29.97%

+10.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.97%

-51.72%

+13.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.85%

-51.72%

+11.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.50%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.56%

-37.36%

+19.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

3.04%

+0.27%

Volatility

FPBFX vs. TWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) is 9.74%, while The Taiwan Fund Inc. (TWN) has a volatility of 12.62%. This indicates that FPBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPBFXTWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.74%

12.62%

-2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.08%

24.28%

-6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.56%

27.92%

-6.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.48%

24.23%

-4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.88%

22.70%

-4.82%

Dividends

FPBFX vs. TWN - Dividend Comparison

FPBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.14%, which matches TWN's 6.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPBFX
Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund
6.14%8.19%5.99%5.36%8.76%14.97%4.45%0.75%10.88%4.36%2.38%3.61%
TWN
The Taiwan Fund Inc.
6.14%11.62%19.14%1.26%0.00%7.78%12.91%8.26%11.27%3.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPBFX and TWN have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TWN has higher volatility (12.62%) compared to FPBFX (9.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPBFX dropped -69.06% vs TWN's -79.52%.

TWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.91 vs 2.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPBFX and TWN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer