FPBFX vs. TRCLX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FPBFX (Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund) and TRCLX (T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - FPBFX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while TRCLX is a China Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 5 years, FPBFX returned 10.54%/yr vs 3.14%/yr for TRCLX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.04% expense ratio.

Performance

FPBFX vs. TRCLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) and T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund (TRCLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPBFX achieves a 28.11% return, which is significantly lower than TRCLX's 30.04% return.

FPBFX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 0.30%
• 6M: 19.05%
• YTD: 28.11%
• 1Y: 47.52%
• 3Y*: 25.66%
• 5Y*: 10.54%
• 10Y*: 12.62%

TRCLX

• 1D: -2.18%
• 1M: 0.49%
• 6M: 23.49%
• YTD: 30.04%
• 1Y: 57.72%
• 3Y*: 21.08%
• 5Y*: 3.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPBFX vs. TRCLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FPBFX Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund	28.11%	37.15%	9.26%	14.07%	-23.71%	2.28%	32.92%	3.57%
TRCLX T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund	30.04%	36.23%	10.95%	-15.51%	-26.24%	6.28%	59.73%	6.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FPBFX and TRCLX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2019	0.67

The correlation between FPBFX and TRCLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FPBFX vs. TRCLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPBFX

FPBFX Risk / Return Rank: 82
FPBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FPBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FPBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FPBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FPBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

TRCLX

TRCLX Risk / Return Rank: 92
TRCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
TRCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
TRCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
TRCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
TRCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPBFX vs. TRCLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) and T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund (TRCLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FPBFX	TRCLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	2.70	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	3.32	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.45	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.87	5.42	-1.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.63	17.99	-4.35

FPBFX vs. TRCLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the TRCLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPBFX and TRCLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FPBFX vs. TRCLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPBFX drawdown since its inception was -69.06%, which is greater than TRCLX's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPBFX and TRCLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FPBFX	TRCLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.06%	-50.67%	-18.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.25%	-10.47%	-1.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.48%	-25.49%	+6.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.97%	-48.62%	+10.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.12%	-8.46%	+4.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.54%	-22.43%	+4.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	3.15%	+0.32%

Volatility

FPBFX vs. TRCLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) and T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund (TRCLX) have volatilities of 10.00% and 10.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FPBFX	TRCLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.00%	10.22%	-0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.13%	17.48%	+1.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.51%	21.01%	+1.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.70%	23.59%	-3.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.97%	23.64%	-5.67%

FPBFX vs. TRCLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FPBFX and TRCLX have an expense ratio of 1.04%.

Dividends

FPBFX vs. TRCLX - Dividend Comparison

FPBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%, more than TRCLX's 1.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPBFX Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund	6.40%	8.19%	5.99%	5.36%	8.76%	14.97%	4.45%	0.75%	10.88%	4.36%	2.38%	3.61%
TRCLX T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund	1.26%	1.64%	1.78%	2.56%	2.76%	8.23%	1.50%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FPBFX and TRCLX in my portfolio?

FPBFX and TRCLX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FPBFX or TRCLX?

TRCLX has higher volatility (10.22%) compared to FPBFX (10.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPBFX dropped -69.06% vs TRCLX's -50.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.