FPBFX vs. FHKTX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FPBFX (Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund) and FHKTX (Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M) are both mutual funds - FPBFX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FHKTX is a China Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FPBFX returned 11.77%/yr vs 12.73%/yr for FHKTX. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FPBFX charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for FHKTX.

Performance

FPBFX vs. FHKTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M (FHKTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPBFX achieves a 20.91% return, which is significantly lower than FHKTX's 25.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FPBFX has underperformed FHKTX with an annualized return of 11.77%, while FHKTX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.73% annualized return.

FPBFX

• 1D: 4.72%
• 1M: -3.98%
• 6M: 10.89%
• YTD: 20.91%
• 1Y: 35.83%
• 3Y*: 21.88%
• 5Y*: 9.86%
• 10Y*: 11.77%
• ALL TIME*: 8.04%

FHKTX

• 1D: 2.48%
• 1M: -4.88%
• 6M: 13.23%
• YTD: 25.43%
• 1Y: 51.89%
• 3Y*: 26.43%
• 5Y*: 8.34%
• 10Y*: 12.73%
• ALL TIME*: 8.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FHKTX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FPBFX Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FPBFX vs. FHKTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FPBFX Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund	20.91%	37.15%	9.26%	14.07%	-23.71%	2.28%	32.92%	32.21%	-18.08%	40.06%
FHKTX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M	25.43%	41.85%	22.53%	-0.84%	-24.32%	-14.20%	46.95%	34.26%	-17.96%	50.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FPBFX and FHKTX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2008	0.84

The correlation between FPBFX and FHKTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FPBFX vs. FHKTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FPBFX

FPBFX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FPBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FPBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FPBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FPBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FPBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

FHKTX

FHKTX Risk / Return Rank: 82
FHKTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FHKTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FHKTX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FHKTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FHKTX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FPBFX vs. FHKTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M (FHKTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FPBFX	FHKTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.97	-0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	2.53	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.34	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	3.96	-1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.40	11.28	-2.88

FPBFX vs. FHKTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the FHKTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPBFX and FHKTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FPBFX vs. FHKTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPBFX drawdown since its inception was -69.06%, which is greater than FHKTX's maximum drawdown of -58.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPBFX and FHKTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FPBFX	FHKTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.06%	-58.83%	-10.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.58%	-12.32%	-1.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.48%	-22.25%	+2.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.97%	-48.52%	+10.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.85%	-58.83%	+18.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.51%	-10.14%	+0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.53%	-18.99%	+1.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.07%	4.32%	-0.25%

Volatility

FPBFX vs. FHKTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund (FPBFX) has a higher volatility of 9.25% compared to Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M (FHKTX) at 8.74%. This indicates that FPBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHKTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FPBFX	FHKTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.25%	8.74%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.41%	20.81%	-0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.72%	24.77%	-1.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.97%	24.70%	-4.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.13%	22.66%	-4.53%

FPBFX vs. FHKTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPBFX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FHKTX's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FPBFX vs. FHKTX - Dividend Comparison

FPBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.78%, more than FHKTX's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHKTX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M	1.01%	1.27%	1.10%	1.27%	0.29%	10.88%	4.51%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%	14.81%
FPBFX Fidelity Pacific Basin Fund	6.78%	8.19%	5.99%	5.36%	8.76%	14.97%	4.45%	0.75%	10.88%	4.36%	2.38%	3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FPBFX and FHKTX in my portfolio?

FPBFX and FHKTX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FPBFX or FHKTX?

FPBFX has higher volatility (9.25%) compared to FHKTX (8.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPBFX dropped -69.06% vs FHKTX's -58.83%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHKTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.