PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPAS vs. ZROZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPAS vs. ZROZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FPA Short Duration Government ETF (FPAS) and PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPAS achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than ZROZ's 0.97% return.


FPAS

1D
0.49%
1M
0.62%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
-0.17%
1Y
2.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZROZ

1D
-1.20%
1M
4.33%
YTD
0.97%
6M
0.53%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
-7.55%
5Y*
-11.93%
10Y*
-4.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPAS vs. ZROZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FPAS
FPA Short Duration Government ETF
-0.43%7.15%-0.42%
ZROZ
PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund
0.97%-1.84%-8.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FPAS and ZROZ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2024

0.63

The correlation between FPAS and ZROZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPAS vs. ZROZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPAS
FPAS Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FPAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPAS Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FPAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPAS Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

ZROZ
ZROZ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ZROZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZROZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZROZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
ZROZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZROZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPAS vs. ZROZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Short Duration Government ETF (FPAS) and PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FPASZROZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.04

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

0.23

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.33

0.50

+2.83

FPAS vs. ZROZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPAS Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the ZROZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPAS and ZROZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FPAS vs. ZROZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPAS drawdown since its inception was -2.47%, smaller than the maximum ZROZ drawdown of -62.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPAS and ZROZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPASZROZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-62.93%

+60.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-14.02%

+11.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-59.10%

+57.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-24.14%

+23.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

6.39%

-5.49%

Volatility

FPAS vs. ZROZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FPA Short Duration Government ETF (FPAS) is 1.24%, while PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund (ZROZ) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that FPAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZROZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPASZROZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

3.60%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.40%

10.77%

-8.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.27%

15.76%

-12.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.12%

23.83%

-19.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.12%

22.06%

-17.94%

FPAS vs. ZROZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPAS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ZROZ's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FPAS vs. ZROZ - Dividend Comparison

FPAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, less than ZROZ's 5.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPAS
FPA Short Duration Government ETF
4.76%4.75%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZROZ
PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Fund
5.04%4.96%4.58%3.52%2.76%1.60%1.68%2.22%2.06%2.53%3.00%2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPAS and ZROZ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZROZ has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to FPAS (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPAS dropped -2.47% vs ZROZ's -62.93%.

On 1-year performance, ZROZ leads with 3.18% vs 2.91% for FPAS. On fees, FPAS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FPAS has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZROZ has performed better with a 3.18% return vs 2.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FPAS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ZROZ.

ZROZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.04%, compared with 4.76% for FPAS.

They also come from different issuers: FPA and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FPAS and 0.15% for ZROZ.

FPAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPAS and ZROZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer